Saturday, December 7, 2013

HOT OFF THE PRESS: Fall Survey “COMMENTS” Published on Board Docs


In the interest of transparency, we are publishing  the Comments submitted by Parents, Residents and Staff who took the D181 Online Fall Survey last month.  These comments have been copied from the information published on Board Docs for the December 9, 2013 BOE meeting.  For those of you who want to read the content directly from the D181 Board Docs, you can go to the following links:


Later this weekend we will publish a post that will focus on what the survey results and comments mean to us as Concerned Parents, and what we hope they will mean for the Board of Education.  

It is important to point out that the comments were buried at the end of the survey results presented on Board Docs. Rather than keep the Comment questions in numerical order as they appeared in the survey, they were moved to the end of each constituency group's survey results document.  By doing so, the actual subject areas that respondents addressed are not clearly explained.  Nevertheless, the subject areas of the comments are, in our opinion, pretty self-explanatory, and the content so important that we felt rather than simply summarize them, we would print them here for you to read in their entirety. 

The comments are presented in the following order:  Parent, Staff and Resident.  You will note that rather than be completely transparent, any time a PERSON’S NAME was cited by a respondent  -- in either a complimentary or critical manner -- the Administration blacked it out.  In some case, the name can be inferred from the remaining comment, but in other cases, you will simply have to make an “educated guess.”  We are pretty sure you will be able to figure out who is being referenced. Just for fun, we are also listing in the "Labels" of this post, the names we believe were redacted by the Administration.  You can use them to fill in the blanks. And because we are so appalled that the Administration actually felt it necessary to protect 2 board member names that were cited by a Resident who expressed disappointment in them for their recent comments on the Freedom of Information Act, we are "outing" these board members for you: Current and Former Board Presidents Turek and Nelson.  It is quite sad to realize the censorship that the Administration now resorts to when publishing the community member's comments and concerns! 

We would also invite all of you to review these comments to see if those you submitted were actually published.  We know from past surveys that some parents believe the Administration has not necessarily published all of the submitted comments.  If you believe your comments were not published, please let us know, but more importantly, please alert the Board of Education.

We know there are a lot of comments, but what this means is that enough respondents felt it necessary to spell out their compliments, concerns and questions rather than just apply the “rating scale” the Administration was using to gather data.

PARENT COMMENTS:

Page 3, Q3. From the options below, please select the primary sources you use for information about District 181. (Select all that apply.) If there are additional communication channels you would like the District to consider using (video, Facebook, print newsletters, etc.), please indicate those suggestions...
1                 
more print newsletters sent home in friday folders
Nov 25, 2013 5:40 PM
2                 
XXXXXXX principal has indicated that she believes the PTO has primary responsibiltiy for communicating with parents. When we do get announcements from Prospect school administrators, they are typcially the night before the event, which does not give parents any time to plan.
Nov 24, 2013 3:55 PM
3                 
Local newspaper
Nov 23, 2013 3:19 PM
4                 
Anything coming into my "in" box more likely to be read than having to link to website.
Nov 22, 2013 3:37 PM
5                 
d181 parents blog
Nov 19, 2013 11:24 AM
6                 
email
Nov 18, 2013 6:06 AM
7                 
Definitely the first source is the emails/blasts from the schools
Nov 17, 2013 8:04 PM
8                 
Third grade website
Nov 16, 2013 6:24 AM
9                 
video would be great
Nov 13, 2013 5:04 AM
10                 
D181 Parents for Accountability and Transparency
Nov 5, 2013 7:44 PM
11                 
videos would be useful, with links in emails
Nov 3, 2013 6:52 PM
12                 
Emails work great
Nov 1, 2013 1:25 PM
13                 
actually have a unified way of communicating with parents/families that conveys relevant information about changes and/or potential changes to the curriculum BEFORE they happen...telling me about things after they are already done and/or in place with no ability for me to offer input...other than my TAX DOLLARS...is ridiculous and borders on how the current political system works.
Nov 1, 2013 6:18 AM
14                 
The information is very biased though. It's always overly positive with no touch to reality of what is occurring at the schools or outside the district. The constant celebration is annoying while minimizing the frustrations being experienced by the students, parents and teachers.
Oct 31, 2013 8:34 PM
15                 
The parent blog.
Oct 31, 2013 7:17 AM
16                 
d181 parent blog
Oct 30, 2013 6:40 AM
17                 
What my daughter tells me and emails
Oct 29, 2013 8:38 PM
18                 
Parent Blog -- best source of information out there! Certainly the most transparent.
Oct 29, 2013 8:18 PM
19                 
Oct 29, 2013 8:12 PM
20                 
I love the idea of videotaping more D181 parent events (such as speakers). I attend some but am interested in all of them but sometimes my schedule just doesn't allow me to be there in person. I would take the time to listen or view the materials later.
Oct 29, 2013 7:24 PM
21
I would like to see the district open a message board to share what is going on - and to welcome questions. It is a leap of faith -but open dialogue is key.
Oct 29, 2013 5:36 PM
22
data on individual, school and district test scores when available; networking with other parents
Oct 29, 2013 4:35 PM
23
www.hold181accountable.com
Oct 29, 2013 1:32 PM

Page 3, Q4. Please select the response below that best applies.
1
In the 3 years that we have been in this district, I don't believe that communication has improved. It's about the same. I do think that the equality of education among the schools is lacking. I also think that the district is not transparent in explaining to the parents why they hired  XXXXXXXX to implement the new standards when she clearly failed to make any progress for the students at Monroe. Lastly, I don't think the district has been transparent with its plans to turn things around for the schools that have fallen in the past couple of years.
Nov 25, 2013 5:00 PM
2
We absolutely love the Lane and all its staff. We are frequently embarrassed by the behavior of the D181 board members and their inability to work collaboratively and COMPROMISE.
Nov 25, 2013 4:24 PM
3
Disappointed with test scoring at Monroe. Extremely disappointing as an equal taxpayer and impactful to home value. Also. . .continue to strongly believe that kindergarten curriculum is extremely, extremely weak!
Nov 25, 2013 7:23 AM
4
In the future, please consider adding an option for no comment or unable to answer. I am not knowledgeable on whether the district works in partnership with the staff and community or whether the district communicates with the community. I selected agree but really do not have an opinion on that based on lack of exposure/experience with those areas.
Nov 25, 2013 6:41 AM
5
Communication on Sunday nights is not well planned send it out on Fridays so there is ample time to prepare
Nov 24, 2013 4:48 PM
6
Communication by the district is average to poor. One example is this survey. There was not information about the survey on the district 181 home page.
Nov 24, 2013 3:55 PM
7
The current forum does not work.. It is not dynamic or interactive... The forum in my opinion needs to change.
Nov 23, 2013 3:19 PM
8
Recent changes in curriculum are geared toward excelerated students only, leaving behind those who are now considered average. The workload is excessive with no benefit. Current teachers have expressed concern that the new curriculum is too intense & too shallow. The many ways of learning a skill do not allow for mastering any one skill. This is a major flaw & disservice to our children. The stress students face have a direct correlation to the anxiety, depression, drug & alcohol use that is all too common in our community.
Nov 23, 2013 2:08 PM
9
See above. I don't like feeling that I need to constantly be checking a website. If there is something that needs to be communicated, it should be brought to parents attention rather than expecting them to constantly be checking website or facebook page, etc.
Nov 22, 2013 3:37 PM
10
I don't know the answers to some, but there is no option for that. I find the piecemeal approach to communications with newsletters to be unhelpful. I checked "STRONGLY DISAGREE" where it wouldn't let me say "DON'T KNOW" -- next time hopefully you'll include that.
Nov 22, 2013 12:25 PM
11
Left the "improved" part blank... Not sure improved since when...? (last year? 5 years ago?) I seem to think it's about the same... but no option to mark that.Actually it would not let me leave it blank. I feel it is just as good as it has always been.
Nov 22, 2013 11:58 AM
12
I wish you would have offered a neutral choice for these questions, I really have no specific knowledge about the BOE
Nov 20, 2013 7:01 PM
13
I don't think it meets the needs of advanced students.
Nov 19, 2013 8:23 PM
14
Has any 181 Board of Education member been into a classroom to see what is being taught? Or are they just basing decisions on what staff shares out? There is no transparency in this district any more. Parents have to jump through many hoops to figure out just what is going on in the schools. Administrators are lacking information at community events or vaguely giving answers that don't truly address the questions at hand.
Nov 19, 2013 7:11 PM
15
The teachers are the problem in regards to the question of "provides a high quality education for all"-not the admin or the parents.
Nov 19, 2013 10:36 AM
16
There should be a neither agree or disagree choice
Nov 19, 2013 10:17 AM
17
While the website functions it seems to have reached a point where too many people are involved in updating the information or possibly the single person involved in the updating and useability of the website is not in touch with the end user. For example, I do not want to scroll down past pictures of students to see the important information. There are also too many layers to the site and it is VERY heavy on text and less readable than other sites.
Nov 18, 2013 7:41 AM
18
Until tracking is gone and all students have equal learning opportunities - d181 will continue to not provide quality education to all students.
Nov 17, 2013 4:45 PM
19
Not to all, only to some.
Nov 17, 2013 10:05 AM
20
I agree that all students receive a "high quality education," but it seems to me that the students at the top receive a more "high quality education." You know -- "some are more equal than others"?
Nov 16, 2013 11:45 AM
21
please explain the various board meetings. i am still not sure what is meant by the different titles
Nov 8, 2013 4:44 PM
22
We are new to the district, and feel that communication is lacking, as far as testing, differentiation, and what the kids are doing curriculum-wise in school.
Nov 8, 2013 2:51 PM
23
In a survey of this nature, it would be important to have a "no opinion" or "neutral" option on your scale. It seems like you risk bad data if you don't give people an option to opt out of a particular choice.
Nov 6, 2013 2:26 PM
24
The BOE works in partnership with the administration rubber stamping flawed programs. It discounts the community's input. Performance data is presented illogically and not in a timely fashion so that decisions can be made. The quality of education is deteriorating. Our ISAT results and school rankings certainly show that is the case. When we pay the 2nd highest teacher salaries in the state, our schools should be at the top of the rankings. I'm not blaming our poor performance on the teachers but rather XXXXXXXXXX sweeping curriculum changes implemented without quantifiable research as to their viability.
Nov 6, 2013 4:10 AM
25
General information is ok. Any academic/scoring information is very difficult to ascertain.
Nov 4, 2013 8:02 PM
26
After the elimination of the gifted program-d181 not longer meets the needs of the gifted students in elementary school.
Nov 3, 2013 6:57 PM
27
curriculum changes seem to be very confusing and not well communicated.
Nov 3, 2013 6:52 PM
28
With the new core standards changes, it would have been nice for someone to put it in lay man's terms/ concise format for the parents. After much discussion, Newspapers articles and publications, I am still not clear as to what the changes are.
Nov 1, 2013 1:25 PM
29
The underhandedness of the district's activities and lack of transparency is appalling. The administration and BOE lack of accountability is apathetic. XXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXX should resign immediately.
Nov 1, 2013 9:23 AM
30
the "new" curriculum is controversial...those that disagree or have questions are not offered a genuine opportunity to express concern...the changes that are being effected on the kids and the learning feel forced and communication is not open...we are in November now and communication through the schools to the parents...through the district to the parents is non existent as it relates to the actual curriculum being taught...kids are coming home with questions on how to do BASIC skills that should be taught...it is sad to see D181 now as compared to just 2-3 years ago...
Nov 1, 2013 6:18 AM
31
The SELAS and FRN education opportunities are usually of good quality. The ALP symposium and other opportunities last year were of little substance and after the fact. The district meetings at the library involved long winded vague answers by XXXXXX and her staff obviously to limit questions and silence the community. XXXXXXX continues to do this on podcasts. She treats the community as though they are naive. She doesn't really provide any information or answer the question directly. The board has avoided communicating with the community and answering questions posed during public comment. It seems this Learning for All plan is much more important than the students. It's easy to wait another year when you don't have children in the district. Shouldn't you be even more diligent about making sure things are working? How can you even ask about partnership when the board clearly told the task force to ignore the community. One of the board members even said something like "we will take care of the community". What does that mean? This is a school district. The board should care about all kids! The community elected each and every one of you. The district has reduced the number of phone calls to parents which is great. This should be reserved for emergencies. The district communications are helpful but the articles in the Hinsdalean are always very one-sided and usually written to tout the district's horn to the point where most people don't even read them.
Oct 31, 2013 8:34 PM
32
I wish the District had a more transparent and clear information for new IEP parents. It has taken me 6 years to "barely" understand my rights and the school rights.
Oct 31, 2013 7:35 AM
33
Eliminating the gifted programs was shocking, especially since teachers haven't been given any inservice on the needs of these students. These children should
be nurtured, along with every other child in the school. If the high school offers varsity sports for superior athletes, why are more challenging classes for quick learners so unfair? My daughter will never be a varsity soccerJust as children are cut from varsity sports, they should be cut from enriched classes. Would Hinsdale Central put a bad football player on the field to compete if he couldn't keep up? No. Just because some parents want their kids to be advanced doesn't mean that teachers are responsible for advancing them.
Oct 31, 2013 7:17 AM
34
curriculum is not rigorous enough, the math program needs imediate attention & correction, and the gifted program needs to be retained.
Oct 31, 2013 6:50 AM
35
I feel like the communication improvements were a result of parent's pushing for this. It did not feel like it was done willingly. I would cite the 3rd grade math communication debacle of last year.
Oct 30, 2013 11:09 AM
36
Many parents wanted to attend that district wide SELAS meeting. No one knew anything about it until after the meeting. While the district seems positive at first glance, much of the time, it is simply a pat on the head; they say what they think you want to hear; they protect the staff no matter how wrong or incompetent they are.
Oct 30, 2013 6:43 AM
37
The politics between the school board and administration has isolated and excluded many parents. In my opinion, the administrations invitations for feedback are insincere, and parental feedback is not seriously considered.
Oct 30, 2013 6:10 AM
38
The BOE is splintered and going on fact finding missions. The BOE is not upholding their job of safe guarding the children of this district and employ 1 employee.
Oct 30, 2013 5:34 AM
39
I have observed special education students who are lacking. While many of these students are in regular education classes, they don't appear to be socially integrated well and without necessary support.
Oct 30, 2013 5:27 AM
40
District 181 website is very difficult to navigate when looking for information related to school board meetings, esp. past meetings. Many decisions seemed to be made without regards to community input.
Oct 30, 2013 5:14 AM
41
The board is not transparent. We need a new board. Hopefully more community members will step up for the next election who are not empty suits.
Oct 29, 2013 8:18 PM
42
We are new to Hinsdale this year so do not know what the past was like
Oct 29, 2013 7:01 PM
43
Communication is a two-way street. D181 does a lot of presentations - I do not consider that communication - but a lecture.
Oct 29, 2013 5:36 PM
44
D181 went from complete lack of transparency to a little better.
Oct 29, 2013 5:18 PM
45
The website, frankly, could be better. Its not easy to find a school's phone number, vacation dates, or teacher information from a simple search.
Oct 29, 2013 5:14 PM
46
Need to allow public comment at end of board meetings! Often board member discussion needs rebuttal.                  Board must be open to rebuttal comments as sometimes they are not considering all relevant information.                  Comment at the beginning of the proceeding is necessary, but to silence the public after board discussions leaves no opportunity to argue against flawed logic before final decisions are made.
Oct 29, 2013 5:11 PM
47
I am very worried about the Common Core Curriculum and the effect it will have on learning-I am not impressed with the new curriculum for our District, which I know is State and Federally mandated but I have many concerns over the implementation.
Oct 29, 2013 4:57 PM
48
Communication is either non-existent, too late, and/or unitelligible.
Oct 29, 2013 4:56 PM
49
d181 works with the community to further it's own personal agenda -- not to embrace direct criticism and redirect course from a majority audience. The Board is clueless about parent community sentiment regarding the current administration. Where's accountability for declining ISAT and MAP scores (besides the lame excuse about mandated standards). I can see already you have staged this survey to get the responses you want...
Oct 29, 2013 4:38 PM
50
Communication from Board/Admin is cursory at best and not complete, honest or forthcoming on anything but the mundane.
Oct 29, 2013 3:48 PM
51
the administration is not transparent and the learning for all plan is a disaster. we need to talk openly about this and fix the problem
Oct 29, 2013 1:32 PM

Page 3, Q5. Please select the response below that best applies.
1
Questions are misleading because I have dissatisfied with one grade child and satisfied with another
Nov 26, 2013 8:49 PM
2
See above. While I think that CHMS is doing fairly well in these areas, Monroe is not.
Nov 25, 2013 5:00 PM
3
XXXXXXXX has significantly improved the communication to parents at the Lane.
Nov 25, 2013 4:24 PM
4
Some individual teachers communicate too much while others don't communicate at all. There isn't a balance.
Nov 25, 2013 3:40 PM
5
For a child with an IEP, learning disability or other issues, there's very concerned faculty and counselor's throughout. However, my biggest concern is the ability to adapt to unique or less traditional needs, support and avoid "one size fits all" mentality. Needs to be more specialized attention, depending on IEP, and disorders.
Nov 25, 2013 8:58 AM
6
Issues with test scores and kindergarten curriculum as previously noted
Nov 25, 2013 7:23 AM
7
It seems like children only learn computer skills on Mac platform, whereas majority of the world is on Windows platform. I think the children may be missing out on computer skills that are widely used. For example, not using Microsoft Office tools like Word and Excel that are almost essential skills for any computer literate.
Nov 25, 2013 4:58 AM
8
For parents in our community that work full time teacher should provide advance notice at least a week ahead of upcoming assignments verses sending an email about assignments that are the next day
Nov 24, 2013 4:48 PM
9
Prospect has excellent teachers. However, XXXXXXXX and administration is poor. Often times, the teachers do not know the path forward, because there is not strong leadership. Each teacher is left on their own to deal with an issue. The school assumes most mothers do not work, so most meeting and volunteer opportunities are during the day. There is not a push of information out to parents. I've been told by the principal that I need to constantly monitor the PTO website to find out what is happening at the school. Bullying and violence at Prospect is allowed to continue without early intervention. The staff is not provided clear plans to address problem students.
Nov 24, 2013 3:55 PM
10
See above comments
Nov 23, 2013 2:08 PM
11
Prospect PTO Newsletter is great. Wish CHMS had similar communication coming to parents about what is going on each week.
Nov 22, 2013 3:37 PM
12
Too many emails, too much information, often difficult to figure out what to do for busy working people. I checked "STRONGLY DISAGREE" where it wouldn't let me say "DON'T KNOW" -- next time hopefully you'll include that.
Nov 22, 2013 12:25 PM
13
Communication is good. Not sure if improved - I feel it has always been satisfactory. Not gotten worse - just the same... there is no option for that.
Nov 22, 2013 11:58 AM
14
Teachers and administration seem to have "practiced" answers to questions.
When I have asked if my struggling student needs outside help or to have testing I have always received a negative reply, that the school can provide what is needed. However, after years of letting the school "provide what is needed" my struggling student continues to struggle and has never been able to catch up or graduate from being pulled out of class, and yet this is not a red flag for teachers or administrators. Rather, she continues to get average grades on her report card. This leaves me wondering if she is falling farther and farther behind but is allowed to be pushed ahead because teachers and administration are saving face or don't want to spend the time or money on her to do it right or if she would really do just fine without being pulled out of class and the teachers and administrators are overreacting.
Nov 20, 2013 7:01 PM
15
I wonder sometimes if teachers really know my child as a person or just a number on a sheet of paper. The teacher/child connection appears to have disappeared. It's more about the score from the test rather than how my child is as a human.
Nov 19, 2013 7:11 PM
16
The 3rd, 4th and 5th grades at Walker School have horrendous teachers. The number of substitutes per week in 4th grade is ridiculous. Despite the teachers contract allowing for almost 3 weeks of sick leave, this needs to stop. It consistently happens in the 3rd grade class as well. Kids cannot wait to learn and need consistency in teaching. Teacher absences are a problem and have been at Walker for a very long time.
Nov 19, 2013 10:36 AM
17
Information at the grade school level is readily available. Not as much at the middle school level.                  ** I cannot speak for the education provided for all students - only my own.
Nov 18, 2013 1:36 PM
18
The new LA curriculum is a step backwards in terms of writing. I understand the small mini lessons are valuable, but the students are writing the least amount I have seen compared to the last few years.
Nov 17, 2013 8:04 PM
19
The middle school is tracked. differentiation specialist are working as gifted specialists.
Nov 17, 2013 4:45 PM
20
Only to some.
Nov 17, 2013 10:05 AM
21
OK, you've asked twice -- I have to respond twice. Yes, it's a good school. No, all student don't receive the same quality of education. It seems as though a determination is made about a child in elementary school and that determination becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. The kids at the very top are pushed more and challenged more -- it feels like the schools have decided that it's worth it to spend time and effort on the kids at the top. The kids in the middle? Maybe not so much.
Nov 16, 2013 11:45 AM
22
I do not believe students in LA are receiving a quality education as there should be a more rigorous curriculum similar to ELA and include Word Within The Word for all students. I do think those in advanced classes are receiving a higher quality education. I was disappointed with the quality and rigor in the elementary schools but believe D181 is attempting to address said concerns for all students.
Nov 13, 2013 10:12 AM
23
I don't know how math or reading groups are created. How do you determine who is in what group & what does it take to move up? No spelling tests? I'm confused by this. I am most baffled by the math program. I don't understand it, so I find it difficult to teach it my child. And I was told by other moms that a lot of students get math tutors because of the math program. I feel that math should be taught in school and practiced at home. However, I sat at my dinner table a few weeks ago and attempted to teach my daughter & her friend how to do 2 digit multiplication and long division. Neither child had seen this prior to the homework assignment.
Nov 9, 2013 8:22 PM
24
The teacher provides great communication but the principal does not communicate with the parents or the community.
Nov 9, 2013 11:00 AM
25
teachers post dates on website then change them WITHOUT specifically notifying parents. I don"t think it is asking too much for teachers to send an email/written note saying that a date for a parents event had been changed.
Nov 8, 2013 4:44 PM
26
I would like to see an accelerated math class, (one that moves at an accelerated pace, to 'catch up' those able to move at a faster learning rate) not just a class for individuals who already know that curriculum. I also find that it would be helpful to have a class newsletter that conveys what parts of the curriculum were covered.
Nov 8, 2013 2:51 PM
27
Teachers do a good job working within the terms of the administration. "All students" - not all students get the same education. This is where transparency is a problem. This trickles from the administration down.
Nov 8, 2013 2:26 PM
28
One differentiation specialist for 430+ students is completely insufficient. My son remains intellectually unchallenged in school. The school nor the district is meeting his needs. Monroe's test scores continue to decline compared to the other schools in the district.
Nov 8, 2013 1:59 PM
29
I feel the math teachers are not up to the high quality standards at CHMS
Nov 8, 2013 1:26 PM
30
I answered for HMS, Madison would have gotten all strongly agree
Nov 7, 2013 10:34 AM
31
Again, not enough choices. Needed a "no opinion" option.
Nov 6, 2013 2:26 PM
32
The school used to serve all levels of students, now the focus is middle ground leaving the accelerated students unchallenged. the current 4th grade at Walker seems to be a testing ground for new ideas no longer quality education. The homework levels from 2 years ago are down and it seems to be a very lazy teaching environment.
Nov 6, 2013 9:06 AM
33
XXXXXXXXX has been a positive change to the Monroe school environment. I am very thankful and relieved to have him here. The school environment is much more welcoming and any information requests or requests for meeting with XXXXXXXX.  XXXXXXX or my child's teachers have been honored in timely and professional fashion. Huge difference. From an education perspective, I believe my child's teachers try very hard, but they are not able to differentiate for the learning needs of all of these children. It's impossible without the proper support structures. I do not believe that the children in our school are having their needs met across the spectrum of learners. The advanced learners are not being challenged to their fullest capabilities and the struggling learners are not receiving what they need to be successful.
Nov 6, 2013 4:10 AM
34
Could not ask for a better school, teachers or principal!!!
Nov 5, 2013 5:52 PM
35
this would be IN SPITE of the common core and compacting challenges that have been imposed on our teachers.
Nov 4, 2013 8:02 PM
36
concerns regarding the deliverance of the math curriculum over the last two years. not to the fault of the teachers but rather the district.
Nov 4, 2013 12:27 PM
37
I was disappointed in an LA class this year that got to loop. This allowed for those students to receive that teacher 2 years while the other kids never received a chance to be with that teacher. That doesn't seem like equal quality education to all students.
Nov 3, 2013 8:59 PM
38
The gifted students are not being addressed due to the new "learning for all" approach.
Nov 3, 2013 6:57 PM
39
very warm, welcoming school
Nov 3, 2013 6:52 PM
40
As a new parent to the school, I find that while information about events, opportunities, clubs, etc., is available, it is unclear as to what those things are. I get clarity about these items from parents who have older children in the school.
Nov 3, 2013 4:00 PM
41
Hms needs to take a look at their academic strategies class. The teachers use it as a study hall for their students. The teachers need to have a preplan each week for academic strategies. This should not be set up as a study hall. This class should teach study skills to students.
Nov 3, 2013 10:51 AM
42
The gifted children are not challenged enough with the current curriculum and I do not see the changes that have been made doing anything to help. When they enter Hinsdale Central they are in no way prepared for the level of learning and work that takes place in the Honors classes. In our experience the largest holes occur in the science and history subjects. The one exception to this is the way that XXXXXXXXX works with her students to make sure they are prepared in every way, all of the teachers should follow her lead. The students go from one hour of homework per night in middle school to 4 to 5 hours of work a night at Central. They do not have the study skills needed to succeed at the next level. District 181 needs to closely look at what is expected at Central and prepare these students XXXXXXXX and the administration needs to look at the curriculum at Central and adjust district 181 curriculum appropriately. The students from Butler come in prepared the students from district 181 are not! It has been a very difficult and disappointing situation to watch my children struggle with this transition.  It concerns me that you think that all of the students of all levels can be taught in one classroom. This is not at all what they do at the high school when the classes are divided into several different levels. It just makes sense that the teachers can teach more effectively and the students are in a much better learning environment. The brightest students aren't bored waiting for the others to understand what is being taught and the children that take longer to grasp the concepts are not frustrated that they can't keep up. Don't be afraid to challenge these gifted students more they can handle it and it will prepare them more for what lies ahead. One final comment that I have is that XXXXXX, the administration and the board should be very concerned about the test results that have recently come back for the district and realize that more needs to be done.
Nov 2, 2013 6:07 AM
43
Our front office is not warm or welcoming
Nov 2, 2013 6:01 AM
44
Thank God that XXXXXX is no longer principal. XXXXXX and XXXXXX should resign immediately.
Nov 1, 2013 9:23 AM
45
I do find it discouraging that parent volunteers are not welcome in the classroom. In other districts I had opportunities to volunteer on a regular, meaningful basis to support our teachers. At Oak, I am only welcome at PTO sponsored activities.
Nov 1, 2013 6:34 AM
46
the curriculum for elementary is putting the children at a disadvantage...you cannot expect one teacher to be able to effectively manage multiple skill level groups...doing away with the enrichment programs for students that tested/placed above the average was a mistake...you are racing all kids to the middle...when you have 4 groups of children consisting of 5 kids in each group...all at different levels...how can one teacher manage that? how can one teacher engage the kids at the high end...and the low end...what happens? all is taught to the middle...no matter the skill of the teacher...very disappointed in the implementation of the new curriculum...we are being forced to spend time beyond what we would normally do actually educating our children on basic skills that were taught in the D181 schools 2-3 years ago, that are now being neglected to offer a new "team" approach with "workshop" formats...these buzzwords/labels are not transparent...they showcase the inadequacies of a group style of education that does not reward individual accomplishment, instead encourages group think...and suppresses individual children actually striving for excellence...
Nov 1, 2013 6:18 AM
47
The quality of education really depends on the teacher you get. The class websites don't always provide up to date information and most grade levels have no daily homework information. It would make life so much easier for students and parents and probably the teachers. There are no links to the most up to date district plans. Too much focus on technology sometimes. No communication when the teacher is going to be out of the classroom or calls in sick. It would be nice to know of planned vacation or time and sick days. I disagree with teachers being part of committees and training during school hours. The is already not enough time in the day for everything that goes on.
Oct 31, 2013 8:34 PM
48
Communication attempts with individual teachers is very difficult -i.e. lack of response to emails, voice mails is very unprofessional and seems to be pervasive to most of the teachers in this school
Oct 31, 2013 7:40 AM
49
Not the information about IEP's rights and obligations. It should be more accesible and clear.
Oct 31, 2013 7:35 AM
50
The academics need to be more rigorous with opportunities to differentiate students starting in first grade. e.g., let strong readers in first grade work with second grade classroom for reading.
Oct 31, 2013 6:50 AM
51
My children have had a handful of very poor teachers with known reputations for low quality, but District 181 continues to employ them despite complaints.
Oct 30, 2013 6:50 PM
52
I do not find the elementary schools as welcoming as they were in the past as parents are not welcome in the school for holiday parties unless they are the 3 or 4 parents volunteering and the safety badges make it seem very unfriendly when arriving at school.
Oct 30, 2013 1:27 PM
53
A tough transition from elementary school wih all of the homework. Would be nice if we had a few "flipped" classes where students could view lectures online and do the packets at school.
Oct 30, 2013 9:32 AM
54
All students are NOT receiving a quality education. Some students are being over looked. Some students are being made to feel they aren't as smart as others.
Oct 30, 2013 8:23 AM
55
Teachers need to be more available before and after school. Teachers should be on the playgrounds during recess. We have too much reliance on assistants that don't always work well with children.
Oct 30, 2013 6:43 AM
56
The Lane's communication is fantastic weekly. However, teacher to parent communication in what is happening at grade level is lacking.
Oct 30, 2013 5:34 AM
57
XXXXXX is a great principal and creates a wonderful middle school
environment.
Oct 30, 2013 5:27 AM
58
I think the sign up genius can be confusing, not user friendly.
Oct 30, 2013 3:24 AM
59
Disagree is based on the presentation of Common Core. The presentations and information provided have been misleading to date and if the presenters and staff are being honest then they are sadly misinformed about common core.
Oct 29, 2013 9:59 PM
60
HMS is a well run school. The principal is an outstanding administrator.
Oct 29, 2013 8:18 PM
61
Communication has improved with XXXXXX  as principal, but the staff still could use some parent communication training. Some teachers are very dismissive of children's needs.
Oct 29, 2013 8:12 PM
62
The school welcomes dialogue - there need to be more forums for discussion. Input increases the possibilities.
Oct 29, 2013 5:36 PM
63
The leveled LA and Social Studies classes are discriminatory and create a false elitism throughout our cumminity.
Oct 29, 2013 5:18 PM
64
I am disappointed that there are not more quality programs for gifted and talented students. Sometimes school information requires mysterious passwords that are not readily evident.
Oct 29, 2013 5:14 PM
65
Need more gifted programs.  Need smaller classes 27 students is a lot compared to other district classes
Oct 29, 2013 5:14 PM
66
It has until this year with all of my older children-I am definitely noticing some differences and am hoping that our high achieving district does not disappoint me with Common Core curriculum, which I'm not impressed with at this point.
Oct 29, 2013 4:57 PM
67
Communication from the school is a joke! For instance, today I received a hold harmless agreement from the school concerning student home use of iPads. However, there was no accompanying information as to why students are getting iPads, what they will be doing with them, or when it will happen. In fact. I find that none of the communication from school ever answers those basic questions.You ought to consider providing the "who, what, why, when, and how," in each of your communications.
Oct 29, 2013 4:56 PM
68
XXXXXXX is the best leader in d181 and is revered by the parent and student community. It doesn't get better than XXXXXX The quality of education is set at the district not individual school.
Oct 29, 2013 4:38 PM
69
CHMS is a HUGE HUGE improvement from Monroe! Monroe would be rated strongly disagree on all of these!!! Still special needs are not being met due to administration and not CHMS
Oct 29, 2013 4:35 PM
70
It is impossible to provide a high quality education to all students within four classroom walls in a heterogeneous environment. Without knowledge of how much parents are reteaching, enriching and tutoring you have no way of deriving valid information from your assessment data. teachers are not super humans and there are only so many hours in a day. Student needs are significantly diverse day to day, subject to subject. At best you are teaching to the middle and hoping the bottom will learn something. The top are not being challenged appropriately. One size never fits all.
Oct 29, 2013 3:48 PM
71
My school and teachers are wonderful. The curriculum is a mess. That it is district's fault
Oct 29, 2013 1:32 PM

Page 4, Q7. Please select the response below that best applies.
1
Common Core is no longer newsworthy, let's move on to actual curricular issues and the real meaning of differentiation
Nov 26, 2013 8:51 PM
2
...I think our district is over focused on test scores and making EVERY child "advanced". Some will be average and that is OK!!!!!
Nov 26, 2013 7:29 AM
3
I hope that learning for all can continue to provide high quality resources for the advanced learners and keep them challenged.
Nov 25, 2013 3:19 PM
4
Meetings are very hard to attend with small children in home. Would greatly appreciate written materials to read, review and understand
Nov 25, 2013 7:24 AM
5
A high level summary should be provided on the website or each schools website- the right communication should be your goal verse 10 emails on the rotary run
Nov 24, 2013 4:51 PM
6
I am famiiliar with the curriculum information on the website. However, there are extra projects, not referenced in the curriculum guide, that don't seem to have any value in terms of skill development or learning, e.g., family tree/heritage, building a musical instrument, etc. Yet, major topics like spelling - don't seem to be addressed.
Nov 24, 2013 4:05 PM
7
There must be a trigger point where the Board says this problem is no longer working... Otherwise what happens if are ranking continue to slide? When do we pull the plug and say its not working... Is it when the Monroe's ranking slips below 200? Well that should happen in 2 years if this trend continues
Nov 23, 2013 3:26 PM
8
Much of the communication and presentations to date has been mostly verbiage. We need it broken down into what the actual changes are, how it impacts our children, and what the teachers are doing to make the change as seamless as possible.  I attended both the family symposium and math common core presentation. I walked away from both with some good information, but also feeling like an opportunity was missed to explain to parents why, when, and how the changes were being implemented. Strip away the talking points and boil it down to basics. Questions were discouraged! There is a perception that D181 is being a guinea pig in the Learning for All Plan. It would great to have that be addressed. People want concrete information on where and how this has worked before. They also want to know what this means for their kids in the classroom. And how we are going to make these changes without discouraging children from learning and wanting to attend school.
Nov 23, 2013 6:05 AM
9
I generally caution about th eimplementation of Cire Standards that were created with more representation from standardized testing companies than educators. I am disappoionted that children as young as kindergarten are being subjected to multiple waves of standardized tests every year. I think this is counterproductive to their education, and I urge the board to consider alternatives.
Nov 22, 2013 12:32 PM
10
There are way too many piecemeal communications for my kids, the school, and the district. I can't keep track.
Nov 22, 2013 12:26 PM
11
I do NOT like the common core agenda. The more we look into it the more disappointed we are due to the very liberal slant in text selections, authors and views of history. I think more and more families will realize this once they find out more.
Nov 22, 2013 12:21 PM
12
Even though I am aware of and understand the Learning for All Plan, I am completely against it. My child should be allowed to work at grade level if this is the pace that is best for him/her. I do not want my children accelerated unless they are showing a need for it. This community supplies enough stress on my children as it is!!!
Nov 20, 2013 7:04 PM
13
We support the learning for all plan. It was a wise decision.
Nov 19, 2013 10:37 AM
14
Learning for All is a much better name than the previous name.
Nov 18, 2013 1:37 PM
15
I understand the Learning for All Plan, but the elementary school students that had been provided with challenging/gifted work are no longer being given equivalent challenges within the classroom for reading or writing.
Nov 17, 2013 8:06 PM
16
I support the learning for all plan. Only wish the plan did not include continuing ace in middle school. Takes away diff specialists for all!
Nov 17, 2013 4:49 PM
17
Not hearing good things about Common Core.
Nov 14, 2013 7:34 PM
18
I would like to see more written info on the 3 plans.
Nov 9, 2013 10:17 AM
19
we need ACE or something like it brought back. my child is suffering. how it was done last year was better than bussing all to Monroe
Nov 8, 2013 4:45 PM
20
We are new to Illinois and this district, so although our old school has the same core standards, they approach them differently.
Nov 8, 2013 2:53 PM
21
Common core is complicated and frustrating. A written communication that explains it in an easy to understand way would be much appreciated.
Nov 8, 2013 7:53 AM
22
I have attended meeting after meeting about the Learning for All plan. I do not need to be further educated on it. I'm embarrassed that our administration has put this flawed plan together. The Learning for All plan is not what Dr. Moon had recommended. I would rather                  XXXXXX and her staff focused on fixing its flaws before they cause any further damage to our children's education.
Nov 6, 2013 4:13 AM
23
Enough about the common core challenges. Focus on truly gifted children and those with bona fide special needs. The middle cohort are likely benefitting from this ALP, the ends of the continuum are not. It is teaching to the middle of the bell curve and hoping you land a teacher who "gets" the outlier kids. Learning For All is Backfiring for All. I anticipate many more problem behaviors in the classrooms as one of the fallouts. SELAS cannot be the answer to the understimulated nor the overwhelmed student whose needs are being squelched. This model is giant steps backwards.
Nov 4, 2013 9:17 PM
24
I am very disappointed in the learning for all implementation at monroe school. I am spending more time than ever at the dining room table teaching math to my children. they are being forced to move on when they have not mastered basics. very frustrating at a parent and teacher level.
Nov 4, 2013 12:29 PM
25
The Learning for all program is not tested and simply a theory that is not proven. It is not meeting the needs of my son, who is a gifted student at Monroe and has been completely ignored and unchallenged since the elimination the gifted program.
Nov 3, 2013 6:58 PM
26
181 has blurred the lines between the Common Core and Learning For All
Nov 3, 2013 6:53 PM
27
i want to know why it took so long for district 181 to try to implement these standards- in such a good school district - they now seem behing the tmes and experimenting with my children;. and I also feel and believe they don't want our imput
Nov 2, 2013 4:58 PM
28
Can a simple concise explanation be provided by email to the parents?
Nov 1, 2013 1:26 PM
29
transparency in communication would be a novel concept...not just a catchy buzzword...
Nov 1, 2013 6:19 AM
30
It is very disappointing that the district and board did not include questions about whether we agree with this plan, Math acceleration for all students, mixing students of all levels, what we think of the new curriculum that has been implemented for Reading, Writing and Spelling, what we think about differentiation, amount of homework and whether our child is challenged, frustrated or bored. This should have been of the utmost importance with a plan that has obviously never been implemented. As parents that paid premium dollars to move into this district, it is disappointing to see how disengaged and lax the board is for a new plan they pushed through. The schools did not perform well this year overall. It is time to stop the celebration and make the administration do their job or get someone more qualified. All of the other districts are focused on Common Core except for us. We are doing a major overhaul.
Oct 31, 2013 8:34 PM
31
I understand the Learning for All Plan, but I disagree with it. Look at Brook Forest Elementary School in Oak Brook, and just do what they do. They are rated 11th, and The Lane is rated 49th! Obviously, Learning for All is a bad idea.
Oct 31, 2013 7:20 AM
32
The LFA Plan has negatively impacted my child. I understand that students do not need to be advanced one grade level in order to meet the common core standards contrary to what parents have been lead to believe.
Oct 30, 2013 7:57 PM
33
I don't need more information on the Common Core and Learning for All. I am more interested in how Elm will handle this. I am hoping this won't mean more reliance on classroom assistants that don't have the background necessary to teach our children.
Oct 30, 2013 6:48 AM
34
I would prefer this information to come via newsletters/email versus meetings. Due to our family schedule, it is difficult to attend the meetings.
Oct 30, 2013 5:29 AM
35
Staff and communicators need to be open and honest about common core. The assertion that common core is not a requirement of the federal government is laughable. School districts receive money in exchange for adopting common core. So technically the answer that it is not required is correct however, it is very misleading. If the district did not receive federal money for adopting common core then the administrators have acted negligently. If money was received then the district is not being transparent. The district needs to be open and hoest about common core rather than spewing the talking points promulgated by those behind it or risk an adverse situation later when all of the parents finally find out what is being concealed.
Oct 29, 2013 10:03 PM
36
I don't have much interest other than to avoid having my taxes raised as D181 throws money at a perceived problem
Oct 29, 2013 8:40 PM
37
If differentiation was the motivation for the LFA plan, then why did the gifted specialists all of a sudden lose their expertise, (even though no other schools in the area have eliminated their gifted specialists) and receive new titles of "differentiation" specialists? No new gifted teachers were hired - they all transformed into "Differentiation specialists". Special education teachers were not given new job titles. Nor were their jobs eliminated. Gifted children still have distinct needs, but all of a sudden, their trained specialists received new titles and were expected to work with even more students. Just because you take their teachers away doesn't mean than these advanced learners no longer have special learning needs. LFA has done a major disservice to these children with specific learning needs. It is just as discriminatory as eliminating services to any other subset of children. All children deserve to be challenged, but let's face it, all children are NOT the same. Yes, the old ACE program had problems, and was "indefensible" but what you have replaced it with is much, much worse.
Oct 29, 2013 8:29 PM
38
The second statement above is not the statement that we should be asked about. Rather, the statement should be about whether we agree with the ALP/Learning for All Plan. Hope the next questions address this.
Oct 29, 2013 8:20 PM
39
CC and LfAP both are very esoteric. I would like to see the actual materials and the implementation of these broad ideas. I think it is important to know what is going on - and see the checks and balances. Other states have pilots of the PARCC why aren't D181 among these. How do we assess the success for the next year.
Oct 29, 2013 5:39 PM
40
I need to know the data on how the experimental Tiered program affected the progress of the middle and lower tracks.
Oct 29, 2013 5:20 PM
41
I would love to know more. But you need to communicate in English and not in inside languages. All the acronyms are impossible to follow and the guarded language makes it seem less than worthwhile to wade through. I have no interest in attending meetings which I perceive will be filled with angry parents wielding pitchforks. I am generally in support of the professionals that are working on education in the district, but I would like more clear information.
Oct 29, 2013 5:17 PM
42
I feel my student is NOT benefitting from the learning plan for all. I feel my student had a betterlearning experience 2 years ago. Last year was not a good experiences. Ritz year ix still open for judgement
Oct 29, 2013 5:17 PM
43
I think Common Core has gone too far to the opposite end of the spectrum from learning the basics-it needs to be balanced and still incorporate more traditional skills at a pace that can be managed by staff and students. The Learning For all Plan is great in theory but the average and low students need a slower pace and the curriculum needs to include more practice on basic skills-while incorporating higher level thinking skills-not one extreme or the other. There are still many "quirks" to work out in order to make this new program work. We have always had such a high achieving, high scoring, blue ribbon District and I worry about the fallout in the next few years with all the changes, which are very drastic in regards to time spent on skills and the emphasis on student driven learning- especially for grades 3 and higher, who are used to a different style of learning. Why are some states, who have money, like Texas, refusing to adopt Common Core? Virginia, with so many Federal government families, also chooses NOT to adopt Common Core. Our District receives very little money in State funds as a percentage of total revenue, so I'm not sure why we are fully adopting all the standards. Why fix what's not broken? Some of the concepts seem valuable to incorporate but not the extreme changes across the curriculum. Time will tell but I am glad I have my last child in the District.
Oct 29, 2013 5:11 PM
44
What is the "learning for all plan"? Don't you think this survey should have included a short definition of it at the introductory paragraph? And, jargon like "learning for all" is crutch for the lazy who are either unable or unwilling to explain things in English. Stop it!
Oct 29, 2013 5:02 PM
45
We are all being drug through XXXXXXX ego trip. She decided to fix something that wasn't broken and the declining test scores over the past two years tell the story. It will continue to get worse - who will hold her accountable? We are already experiencing the miserable failure of differentiating within the classroom with unprepared teachers. The                  high achieving students will pay the price for this fiasco.
Oct 29, 2013 4:41 PM
46
Learning for All is the worst thing that ever happened to this district. As someone highly involved and educated in this field, XXXXXXXXX has made decisions that are not at all consistent with research based practices for our students: gifted, mainstream and those with learning differences. Nor does she care when parents go to her with specific data demonstrating Learning for All has caused an adverse impact on their child's education, academic performance and test scores.
Oct 29, 2013 4:37 PM
47
The ELA meeting was an excellent source of information. I look forward to more of those.
Oct 29, 2013 4:10 PM
48
I understand why the administration THINKS there is a valid reason for the development and implementation of the Learning For All Plan but I strongly disagree with their illogical conclusions and weak (if any?) evidence to support the appropriateness of this model for this community. I am tired of hearing CCSS and this model being linked. They are mutually exclusive.
Oct 29, 2013 3:51 PM
49
I am absolutely educated on the Common Core and know that it has nothing to do with The Advanced Learning Plan. I also know that Everyday Math meets the Common Core Standards on grade level. I absolutely understand how my child has been negatively impacted by the ALP.
Oct 29, 2013 3:46 PM
50
I feel the use of Everyday Math will harm students. As an educator I do not believe in the program and I am spending more than $3000 to supplement the math curriculum
Oct 29, 2013 3:34 PM
51
I know all I need to know about Learning for All. In its current form it is Learning for None. I am not a fan. We are taking away all that is good about this district and replacing it with bad.
Oct 29, 2013 1:33 PM

Page 5, Q8. As the District looks to develop a five- to seven-year strategic plan, in the area of Students and Learning, please indicate how important you believe each item is by selecting the appropriate response below. You must select a response for each item. (Respondents are encouraged to select no more ...
1
coding and keyboarding
Nov 26, 2013 9:01 AM
2
Tenure for teachers is eliminated.
Nov 26, 2013 8:01 AM
3
Play STILL important ...learning centers in kdgn are Essential to children learning.seeing effects of no learning thru play and over assessment!
Nov 26, 2013 7:40 AM
4
I am for retaining a topic notch staff, but on a budget of 0% increases in taxes. I do not think there is direct correleaiton between what you spend per student and outcomes.
Nov 25, 2013 12:10 PM
5
Recruit and retain the best possible staff without having to pay twice the Illinois State average for teacher salaries.
Nov 22, 2013 12:35 PM
6
Na
Nov 21, 2013 11:37 AM
7
Students have opportunity to play
Nov 21, 2013 6:40 AM
8
Difficult to answer questions categorically. How would longer school day/year be used? Professional development necessary but would like to see alternatives to loss of class time. What does a high District rank mean in a low ranking state and in an increasingly compromised national ranking? Increased integration of technology a must however only if it supports the curriculum and is not a curriculum driver. Creative, critical thinking students who are great problem solvers a great long term goal only realized if short term basics are not compromised. Math facts, phonetics and, yes, rote memorization have a necessary role in the development of critical thinking and can not be compromised.
Nov 20, 2013 6:16 AM
9
More direct reading instruction and guided outside reading.
Nov 19, 2013 1:33 PM
10
Spend more money on the kids and less on the teachers
Nov 19, 2013 10:41 AM
11
A longer school year should not mean more Teacher In Service Days.
Nov 18, 2013 1:50 PM
12
Provide teachers with the training necessary to differentiate, since that is what they are being asked to do with the LFA Plan. Differentiate in ALL subjects.
Nov 17, 2013 8:10 PM
13
based on ability, not age - are you kidding? Why have that question??? DIFFERENTIATION NOT DAMAGING TRACKING! Stop paying experts like Moon if not going to follow their advise!
Nov 17, 2013 4:57 PM
14
Stop ability grouping!
Nov 16, 2013 12:34 PM
15
How about "District teaches basic math skills & facts in elementary school"? It's my understanding that Everyday Math is still the only math curriculum taught in the elementary schools -- that method works fine for some kids and is a disaster for others. There is no way you can claim to offer differentiated education when you insist that one somewhat controversial approach be applied to everyone.
Nov 16, 2013 12:03 PM
16
My apologies but it is very difficult to limit to 6-7. I know it is also very difficult for the district to prioritze on such important issues. Regarding vocational, I would need the percentage of students who may ulitize because they do not intend to go to college. Regarding rankings. Yes, it would be fantastic to rank number one in the state and nationally and certainly would benefit our property value but rankings are subjective. It is very difficult to compare apples to apples rather you have a comparison of apples to pears. We looked at ranking before moving here which did in fact attract us not only to Hinsdale but the specific neighborhood for a certain elementary school. If I had to do it over, I would have done much more research regarding curriculum , programs offered, admin/teaching experience, as well as BOE involvement.
Nov 13, 2013 10:30 AM
17
Before and after school child care option. 6am start, 6pm end
Nov 12, 2013 6:01 PM
18
Answers would be different for K-5 vs 6-8 grades
Nov 12, 2013 8:32 AM
19
Spanish language education should start in kindergarten.
Nov 9, 2013 11:03 AM
20
I am not for 1 to 1 ipads in the schools - it's fluff.
Nov 8, 2013 2:40 PM
21
Provide more assistance for differentiation, particularly for advanced students.
Nov 8, 2013 2:06 PM
22
I think full-day kindergarten is a great place to start all of these initiatives. We seem to be one of the few districts left who do not have it.
Nov 8, 2013 9:36 AM
23
Less homework in middle school ELA, particularly grade 6 and 8. Accelerated doesn't mean more work, should just be more challenging.
Nov 3, 2013 9:04 PM
24
students master the basics in math and reading to prepare for increased rigor by high school
Nov 3, 2013 7:05 PM
25
Need to work on your special ed. Program at hms. Very week and full of holes.
Nov 3, 2013 10:58 AM
26
Mandatory: Students are literate in computer science (basic programming skills)
Nov 1, 2013 6:40 AM
27
stop wasting resouces/finacnces on staff meeetings during the school year...you are paid/salaried professionals that can meet during off times...evenings...Saturday workshops...Summer...my profession does not allow me to have "paid" time to figure out how to be better, that is done on my time...quit wasing time with bully agendas and political correctness...
Nov 1, 2013 6:28 AM
28
Due to all of the technology they have access to, this generation is already and will continue to be more financially literate and globally aware than previous generations. The district hires and promotions are questionable and people are not qualified for the jobs they are doing. We need to continue to hire well educated and experienced staff.
Oct 31, 2013 8:52 PM
29
Being SPANISH the second languaje to learn, and being the MEXICAN SPANISH the one that influences us more, teachers MUST be chosen with a MEXICAN SPANISH backround. Right now our kids have an Argentinian teacher (!!!!!!!!). Terms are very very different from the Mexican and we in the USA are not exposed to the Spanish languaje from Argentina AT ALL. Art classes to support Spanish are useless. Conversational focus please!
Oct 31, 2013 7:47 AM
30
Elementary school children are too young for vocational training. Focus on math, reading , and writing. They will learn the rest in high school and college. Teachers can learn over the summer and after school. More instructional time for children is important.
Oct 31, 2013 7:26 AM
31
Bullying is alive and well in D181 - it starts at home with the parents. Move on already.
Oct 30, 2013 8:34 AM
32
provide before and after care
Oct 30, 2013 8:16 AM
33
Regarding staff, Walker Teacher salaries are nearly twice the state average. This needs to be gotten under control.
Oct 30, 2013 6:16 AM
34
global aware is more important than languages. Writing!!!
Oct 30, 2013 5:35 AM
35
multiage was a failure 45 years ago i nthe Wilmette school district at highcrest Elementray school. Why would you repeat a historical failure ? The list appears to have left out mathematics. Mathematics should be mandatory.
Oct 29, 2013 10:11 PM
36
Because of our socio economic advantages, we should not be concerned with how we compare to the state or national averages. We should only compare ourselves to communities that have the same socio economic background as ours.
Oct 29, 2013 8:45 PM
37
D181 is not a high school. We do not need to offer vocational career training. Who wrote this ridiculous statement? The administration under XXXXXXX leadership has really lost touch with reality.
Oct 29, 2013 8:27 PM
38
21st Century skills are mandatory to our children - they need to drive the bus in technology. I think flexible grouping has a place - but I would do it in smaller chunks - giving mentoring opportunities. Worry about district's ability to teach critical thinking.
Oct 29, 2013 5:45 PM
39
Grammar, writing skills, math basics important (traditional reading, writing, arithmetic)
Oct 29, 2013 5:28 PM
40
All day Kindergarten!!! Really!!! Not all moms in Hinsdale can stay at home.
Oct 29, 2013 5:23 PM
41
World languages? Really? As opposed to what,"other world" languages? Klingon maybe? Isn't it ironic that educucators can't write?
Oct 29, 2013 5:11 PM
42
District will commit to EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICES for students with learning differences!!!
Oct 29, 2013 4:49 PM
43
Students are educated at their instructional level and not heterogeneously grouped; only hire Administrators who have experience in the job they are being hired for
Oct 29, 2013 4:01 PM
44
more staff teaching outside of school hours
Oct 29, 2013 1:36 PM

Page 5, Q9. As the District looks to develop a five- to seven-year strategic plan, in the area of Finance and Facilities, please indicate how important you believe each item is by selecting the appropriate response below. You must select a response for each item. (Respondents are encouraged to select no more...
1
small class sizes matter most K-2
Nov 26, 2013 9:01 AM
2
Eliminate Tenure for teachers. Currently, parent feedback on teacher performance doesn't exist. We are the customer, paying aLOTof money and we should have a voice regarding teacher quality. Some need to go, but the are safe with tenure.
Nov 26, 2013 8:01 AM
3
Merit pay ...unfair based on stu population that each teacher gets..not in teachers control..
Nov 26, 2013 7:40 AM
4
taxes and quality of education are in line with each other
Nov 25, 2013 6:05 PM
5
I think technology intergration should be on the front of teaching programming skills and such, not showing kids how to play games on a computer.
Nov 25, 2013 12:10 PM
6
Eliminate programs that have no value. For example, the presence of XXXXXXX at Prospect. He has handed out the same "Good Touch, Bad Touch" to students 3 years in a row. He was not a good speaker and the children made fun of his poor use of grammar and wondered why they received the same information year after year. This feedback was given to   XXXXXXXX and she did not take any corrective action. Would prefer the district focus on math, science, english, art, music and foreign language.
Nov 24, 2013 4:47 PM
7
Merit based pay is interesting and would be a good way to retain teachers but not sure how realistic that is in our community. I think the classroom dynamics and school/community atmosphere would change and everyone would want to be with certain teachers. ALL of our teachers should be outstanding.
Nov 22, 2013 12:30 PM
8
Again, difficult to answer categorically. For example, class size depends on delivery of education. In a fully differentiated classroom, class sizes must be small to be successful.
Nov 20, 2013 6:16 AM
9
Increased time spent on direct reading instruction through 8th grade.
Nov 19, 2013 1:33 PM
10
HMS does not offer nearly as much technology for teacher-use or student-use as the elementary schools do.
Nov 17, 2013 8:10 PM
11
Gifted specialists should be terminated
Nov 16, 2013 12:34 PM
12
proportionate distribution of specialists according to school population and need, not just one specialist/school
Nov 13, 2013 9:03 PM
13
Healthy working debt should not be an issue. Lowering property taxes seems unrealistic when schools such as HMS need updates. I do not think it is fair that there are discrepancies from building to building.
Nov 13, 2013 10:30 AM
14
class sizes are much larger than we expected. We moved to Hinsdale primarily for the schools and I am dissapointed that my 1st grader has 24 kids in his class.
Nov 12, 2013 9:26 AM
15
"Equal" technology and other items should be based on per student ratio, not raw number of computers. Not equal if same number in each school but one school has far fewer students.
Nov 8, 2013 8:08 AM
16
District has penalties for under performing teachers.
Nov 6, 2013 9:10 AM
17
I'm okay with paying my high property taxes as long as the schools perform at the higest levels. It is not ok to waste our resources in just providing a "good education" as one of the Board members said our children are receiving. We moved here fully prepared to pay high property taxes in exchange of a top-notch education. I'm not asking for a price reduction. Please just deliver what I am paying for.
Nov 6, 2013 4:20 AM
18
small class sizes should be prioritized
Nov 3, 2013 7:05 PM
19
As long as the number of students at HMS remains where it is they need to add more potables. The classrooms are too crowded. I realize that a study was done looking at the area of each classroom and the number of students in each room. What XXXXXXX failed to take into consideration is the very odd shape of the classrooms and how much of the room can't even see the board. The rooms are not square!! The portables are very nice rooms and they are square so everyone can see the board and the teacher.
Nov 2, 2013 6:19 AM
20
if by merit-based pay for teachers you are refering to performance based pay then yes mandatory...if you are refering to some union term for longevity then not important...as the PTO funds much of the technology/equipment it would only seem logicaly that those parents/families would want to see those resources used for their own children, not distributed in some "fair" plan to others...
Nov 1, 2013 6:28 AM
21
We just want our kids to have a solid foundation to succeed in later years. We don't need the focus on technology and modular learning spaces. With this new learning for all plan small class sizes are a necessity. No ones needs will get addressed within the current model.
Oct 31, 2013 8:52 PM
22
Forget the iPads. Teach children how to read, write, and do math. We already have iPads at home.
Oct 31, 2013 7:26 AM
23
need to recognize the paying teachers more doesn't increase quality education
Oct 30, 2013 6:53 AM
24
Investments need to be focused on other areas and NOT on teacher salary and benefits increases.
Oct 30, 2013 5:35 AM
25
Schools need to teach more executive functioning skills in D181 so children are prepared for high school. They must learn the basics before they are expected to become independent thinkers, or decide on a vocation.
Oct 29, 2013 8:45 PM
26
Focus on teacher instruction!!! Do not spend $850,000 on new learning commons and don't use those as a back door to implement a 1 to 1 tech environment
Oct 29, 2013 8:27 PM
27
21st century classrooms are virtual - our kids need to be creating their education.
Oct 29, 2013 5:45 PM
28
Property taxes will never go down and if PTO funds are used for a school, it won't be the same across the District, which is ok, it should be equitable if District funds are used
Oct 29, 2013 5:28 PM
29
I really think the district is doing fine in all these areas. What about more gifted and talented programing? This seems lacking to me.
Oct 29, 2013 5:23 PM
30
Take a hard look at number/pay of Administrators in this District as compared to Districts of similar size/demographics. We are over-administrated and they are overpaid
Oct 29, 2013 4:01 PM

Page 5, Q10. As the District looks to develop a five- to seven-year strategic plan, in the area of Community Involvement, please indicate how important you believe each item is by selecting the appropriate response below. You must select a response for each item. (Respondents are encouraged to select no more ...
1
Dislike mandatory requirements at Prospect, like Bike Rodeo, which force children to take a test - that all students end up passing and placing tages on bike advertising local businesses. Parents should determine if children are mature and skilled enough to ride their bikes to school, not local police and insurance agent advertising services. Please stop these type of events.
Nov 24, 2013 4:47 PM
2
Accountability metrics tie back to goals in order benchmark and measure success
Nov 22, 2013 12:20 PM
3
BoE meetings filled with ACE parents r too hostile to attend.
Nov 16, 2013 12:34 PM
4
I don't feel it's appropriate for the district to advertise for businesses.
Nov 8, 2013 2:40 PM
5
adverting? seriously? you want to XXXXXXXX our kids for revenue?
Nov 1, 2013 9:29 AM
6
if you do not engage your parents...they will move with their tax dollars to neighboring school districts...changes have consequences...you cannot make radical adjustments to curriculums and expect all else to remin constant...
Nov 1, 2013 6:28 AM
7
I don't agree with job shadowing due to age of students and safety concerns.
Oct 31, 2013 8:52 PM
8
Focus on the basics, Math, Science and English, if you do those well then parents and business leaders will be happy. We will teach our children about business, money, values and morals. Keep out of family responsibilities, stick to your core business of basic education. I am a local business owner and a darn successful one, elementary schools can't teach business funadamentals, they just don't have the experience, education nor the training to do so.
Oct 29, 2013 10:11 PM
9
Anyone who pays taxes should be informed about the schools, and should also have a say in how the schools are being run.
Oct 29, 2013 8:45 PM
10
Again, this is not a high school. Job shadowing? How about focusing on in class instruction at grade level? Again, who is running this mad house?
Oct 29, 2013 8:27 PM
11
Schools are part of the community - so they need to be invested in community activities.
Oct 29, 2013 5:45 PM
12
It's a K-8 District, why would students need to job shadow? They can't work until they are 15, with a work permit.
Oct 29, 2013 5:28 PM
13
Job Shadowing in an Elementary District? Our job is to get these kids ready for High School where we want them ALL to go. Of course they won't all go on to college - but most will - let the High School focus on the career track for those who do not go on to college.
Oct 29, 2013 4:01 PM

Page 6, Q13. How have you learned about SEL (social and emotional learning) in your child's school and/or in the District? (Select all that apply.)
1
Worked for district 86 & know through interact with d181
Nov 25, 2013 2:50 PM
2
School Social Worker
Nov 25, 2013 7:30 AM
3
SELAS is poorly executed and not effective, given the lack of response of Propsect administrators to viiolence and bullying.                  Even when incidents are reported, it takes the XXXXXXXX does not respond or complete an incident report in a timely manner.
Nov 24, 2013 4:52 PM
4
Other parents, Town newspaper
Nov 22, 2013 12:32 PM
5
My child
Nov 21, 2013 11:56 AM
6
From my children .... who honestly think there is too much talk about bullying, and I think it is now going in one ear and out the other.
Nov 17, 2013 8:12 PM
7
I searched for information about such a program when we moved to the district last year,
Nov 6, 2013 2:41 PM
8
Last year, XXXXXXXXX created the SELAS wall in our building . Great way to showcase how important it was to her and school
Nov 2, 2013 6:07 AM
9
note the reacurring theme of self initiated communication...
Nov 1, 2013 6:34 AM
10
From other school districts
Oct 31, 2013 7:28 AM
11
Programs other schools are doing
Oct 30, 2013 7:00 AM
12
Having four children endure it.
Oct 29, 2013 8:53 PM
13
The information about SELAS is wordy and technical - I would love to see hands-on SEL. SHort video clips that show what is happening.
Oct 29, 2013 5:51 PM
14
From my child
Oct 29, 2013 5:19 PM
15
We know you implement SELAS -- the real issue is how effective is it really? How are you measuring impact? Many feel it is a lukewarm result
Oct 29, 2013 4:50 PM

Page 6, Q14. What information about SEL/SELAS do you want to know? (Select all that apply.)
1
what is there such a focus on it and less on academics?
Nov 26, 2013 9:03 AM
2
The implememntation of SELAS has not been effective, given the violent environment that is tolerated at Prospect.
Nov 24, 2013 4:52 PM
3
Introduce scienc-based Rational Emotive Education Therapy for teachers to use consistently throughout the district.
Nov 19, 2013 1:37 PM
4
Is there any documentation showing SELAS is improving our children's social and emotional learning?
Nov 18, 2013 1:53 PM
5
How is the district measuring whether or not SELAS is having an impact on students? How do you know if it is successful?
Nov 6, 2013 2:41 PM
6
I'm quite happy with what the lane school does to educate kids and parents
Nov 5, 2013 5:56 PM
7
Why is this even being taught outside of the home? This is a parent/family issue...the district should expect legal issues with forced social agendas...
Nov 1, 2013 6:34 AM
8
The school does not share what is taught by the teachers for SELAS during the school year. Last year it was on the class schedule. Not sure this year how it's being done. How can we help reinforce teachings if we don't know what is being taught?
Oct 31, 2013 9:02 PM
9
Why SEL isn't taught to assistants and why they don't practice it?
Oct 30, 2013 7:00 AM
10
Administrators, teachers, and board members are our children's SELAS role models. Many of the aforementioned could use SELAS training themselves.
Oct 29, 2013 9:07 PM
11
It is a waste of time.
Oct 29, 2013 8:53 PM
12
Are CENTRAL administrators required to participate in SELAS training before they are allowed to deal with parents who come to them about student concerns? If not, they should since many are bullies in their meetings with parents.
Oct 29, 2013 8:30 PM
13
I want to know what SEL feels like - I want warm and engaging words.
Oct 29, 2013 5:51 PM

Page 6, Q15. Please note any ideas / questions related to social emotional learning and SELAS in District 181.
1
Would be useful to get feedback from the social worker teaching SEL As it relates to my child.
Nov 26, 2013 2:58 PM
2
does it need to be so involved and time consuming?
Nov 26, 2013 9:03 AM
3
How does the Middle School Team including principals, teachers and counselors help build a transition to the high school? Does the middle school team meet with the high school team? What programs are available to the middle school students to make the transition less stressful? Do the PTO's work together? D181 is the biggest feeder school to D86 (Hinsdale Central). Also, why aren't there any programs for parents and 5th graders to discuss transitioning from Elementary School to Middle School? Children and parents NEED to hear from current students "what to expect". Maybe summer learning could offer something the week or two before school starts at the actual middle school the child will attend. For example, it could include something like,"Getting to know your new school, new faces, and being confident in your new environment". So many 1st born children struggle with the transition because they don't have anyone that has "gone before them". This also would be a great opportunity for the transition from 8th grade to High School.
Nov 25, 2013 3:57 PM
4
Needs to be emphasized more in middle school, specifically in the areas of empathy/inclusion, moving kids away from the current focus on who/whats' "popular"
Nov 25, 2013 3:01 PM
5
I was surprised to hear this is going on (8) years as it did not seem as though this was implemented as heavy for Kindergarten or this could be due to the class only being 1/2 day or really only a few hours of time. This is another reason why I strongly feel Kindergarten should really go to a full day as the base for SELAS for kids should start there and not wait to really have to be incorporated by 1st grade. To give children this understanding earlier in age and at start of grade schooling, the better it will be for each one overall.
Nov 25, 2013 9:05 AM
6
How can you implement SELAS with children of parents who clearly don't understand the concept. (THe apple does not fall far from the tree.)
Nov 24, 2013 1:26 PM
7
It is not apparent to me that there is any teaching of social skills going on. I see posters and hear talk about it, but I don't think its actually being taught like regular curriculum.
Nov 22, 2013 12:33 PM
8
Thank you.
Nov 22, 2013 12:32 PM
9
Rational Emotive Educational Therapy and Theory is a very powerful, well- researched, science-based system for emotions management, logical problem solving and promotes academic focus. Let's get organized and use the same system in all schools in the district.
Nov 19, 2013 1:37 PM
10
Bullying still exists, even in professional football. Parents need this class/curricula more than the kids. Well done but does not need to be such a focus. Learning to deal with bullying and taking responsibility is the most you can teach...
Nov 19, 2013 10:43 AM
11
SELAS ROCKS!!
Nov 18, 2013 9:19 AM
12
no questions
Nov 17, 2013 12:30 PM
13
Not very effective.
Nov 17, 2013 11:34 AM
14
I have young children in preschool. Both my children began preschool at age 2.5. By the time they begin kindergarten, my children will have attended 3 full years of preschool. They are well accustomed to attending school for a half day and by the third year of preschool, attend school 5 days a week. I am concerned regarding the half day kindergarten status. Most, if not all, of the children in their preschool class appear to be ready for something more in kindergarten. They are ready to be challenged and spend the full day at school. Additionally, I'm concerned about their ability to learn and grow in kindergarten without a significant increase in class time. Most affluent and well performing school districts now utilize full-day kindergarten. I'm concerned that my children will not perform as well as other students, later in their school career, based on their inadequate kindergarten preparation. I would urge the district to seriously consider adding a full-day kindergarten program or at the very least, the option for the same. Based on my communications in the community, I think full-day kindergarten would be well received and more popular than half day.
Nov 7, 2013 1:07 PM
15
Keep doing it!!!
Nov 5, 2013 5:56 PM
16
If D181 staff are interacting with students as described in question #12 (as you have now made me aware) I will be contacting legal counsel. Why are tax/district resources being spent on feelings? Why is empathy relevant to math and the changes being implemented in that curriculum? How are emotions measured in the new science curriculum?
Nov 1, 2013 6:34 AM
17
The adults in the district need to mirror the same behaviors they ask our children to exhibit. The teachers need to be respectful and be aware of how they are affecting children by what they say to one child in front of other children. XXXXXXX  XXXXXXXXX herself is not addressing the social emotional needs of all children by trying to implement a plan which seems to be geared towards personal success and recognition.
Oct 31, 2013 9:02 PM
18
I wish there could be much more practical support for parents with IEP kids. More conferences.
Oct 31, 2013 7:50 AM
19
My child has poor self esteem and it is a direct result of the Learning For All Plan. SELAS is lip service.
Oct 30, 2013 8:05 PM
20
I am a member of the SELAS committee at my school.
Oct 30, 2013 7:29 AM
21
Why aren't teachers working on SEL on the playgrounds and during lunch? More opportunities for bullying, conflict and issues occur during lunch and recess than anywhere else (except on busses). If there's a true commitment to SEL in this district, teachers need to be on the playground and in the lunchroom actually implementing SEL practices.
Oct 30, 2013 7:00 AM
22
Incorporating SEL in the process of differentiating within the classroom. 1 child may be "better" in math than reading, however, another may be a "better" reader. This does not diminish the child's quality, or who the child is.
Oct 30, 2013 5:40 AM
23
While the idea of SELAS sounds good and is important, I have not seen much of an impact. It is too nebulous versus getting to the core root of the problems.
Oct 30, 2013 5:37 AM
24
D181 would benefit by focusing on teacher & administrator professional development with SELAS in order for it to be effective in the schools. The lack of district transparency, disregard of parental input and concerns at meetings, lack of meaningful administrator action, and evasiveness from difficult questions are contrary to SELAS ideals. Most children are too immature to handle many of these issues on their own, but adults should be expected to behave responsibly. Staff and administrations set the tone for the schools. For SELAS to be effective, the entire school culture needs to become more cooperative and positive. Parents will learn from teachers. It needs to be supported and modeled from the top down.
Oct 29, 2013 9:07 PM
25
Eliminate it. It is a huge waste of time and money. The students hate it and the teachers avoid teaching it. I have witnessed its various iterations over the last 14 years through my children and I am not sold on it nor am I impressed. Give the kids a late start day instead of wasting tax dollars and time on this.
Oct 29, 2013 8:53 PM
26
Central administrators, especially in the SPED department need SELAS training!
Oct 29, 2013 8:30 PM
27
I'd love to see more big, experiential SELAS events at the elementary schools directly targeted at the kids where the messages are hit straight on instead of only woven into the current curriculum.
Oct 29, 2013 7:37 PM
28
SEL is our connection to ourselves and the people around us. SEL is what makes us human - our heart.
Oct 29, 2013 5:51 PM
29
I have never heard of this. Neither my child nor his teacher has ever mentioned it.
Oct 29, 2013 5:24 PM
30
Does SELAS address social/emotional implications of learning differences within the school environment - HUGE need especially now that the district has largely eliminated evidence based practices for students with learning differences and the emotional implications of this are being seen across many students
Oct 29, 2013 4:52 PM
31
The district has created a stressful environment through The advanced Learning Plan where students have developed low self esteem.
Oct 29, 2013 4:06 PM


STAFF COMMENTS:

Page 3, Q4. Please select the response below that best applies.
1
I feel VERY comfortable with the above. I think every effort has been made to help me be prepared for this year :-)
Nov 26, 2013 6:16 PM
2
I have taken classes related to curriculum and technology on my own time which has helped increase my knowledge base.
Nov 23, 2013 7:07 PM
3
The addition of iPads to our shared technology at the building was a great benefit to students and teachers as a teaching tool that fit into the curriculum in many ways!
Nov 22, 2013 12:42 PM
4
The PTO has been fantastic getting us the technology hardware that we need to implement innovative teaching practices.
Nov 20, 2013 6:46 PM
5
I have experienced problems trying to implement instruction that uses technology. The technology freezes up. I am unable to get enough devices for students. It is very frustrating.
Nov 19, 2013 7:59 AM
6
Things keep changing and are shared too late.
Nov 18, 2013 9:50 AM
7
With all the new initiatives, I haven't been able to effectively increase the use of technology.
Nov 17, 2013 10:43 AM
8
The technology does not work consistently, having a great impact on my ability to use it as a tool for instruction. An example is when MAP testing took place, technology was basically useless for these weeks.
Nov 17, 2013 5:30 AM
9
It is harder and harder to get access to technology (limited machines) and this year it has been very unreliable due to bandwidth. I have been forced to use less technology in my classroom due to the reasons stated above. I'd love to use it more!
Nov 11, 2013 6:37 PM
10
I still need XXXXXXX help guiding me through the eval process.
Nov 9, 2013 6:37 PM
11
Technology use cannot be increased when it is not readily available to be used.
Nov 8, 2013 7:00 PM
12
Many of the "new" programs implemented have not been new to me. My knowledge hasn't necessarily increased, but the expectations for specific ways to prove I'm using that knowledge have.
Nov 8, 2013 11:45 AM
13
I would have increased my use of technology if there was enough hardware to go around and the internet worked when needed. I have WASTED much time this year attempting to use technology and being disappointed and frustrated.
Nov 8, 2013 10:54 AM
14
I lost the SmartBoard in my room so I know I haven't utilized tech as much as last year.
Nov 7, 2013 1:43 PM
15
It seems impossible to increase technology usage due to the difficulty in securing laptops/computers/iPads. There are not enough to meet demand.
Nov 6, 2013 9:54 AM
16
I feel that certain administrators have "favorites" and these people are continually given "perks" not merited and that this would include high marks on evaluations.
Nov 5, 2013 1:00 PM
17
We are sorely lacking technology that can meet the needs of students. It is
nearly impossible to access computers or ipads for a class since most carts are signed out for most of the year. Problem based, inquiry learning requires access to technology and primary sources and that is an enormous struggle at the moment.
Nov 5, 2013 12:15 PM
18
It is extremely time consuming.
Nov 5, 2013 12:11 PM
19
Availability of technology is a constant concern at CHMS. We need more computer carts and ipads to best incorporate technology in our classrooms and lessons. I am trying to go paperless in my classroom and often times have problems implementing technological aspects due to this.
Nov 5, 2013 5:18 AM
20
To say that knowledge has increases since last year is hard to quantify, knowledge to improve teaching is forever on going !
Nov 3, 2013 10:23 AM
21
My use an knowledge of technology did not increase because I feel it is already very high
Oct 30, 2013 5:26 AM

Page 3, Q7. Please select the response below that best applies.
1
I did not participate in the summer training, because it was not something pertinent to my position, however I did participate last summer. I always spend this much time on my own professional development regardless of whether the district is providing particular professional development for us or not.... it's the nature of the job and summer is perfect for that reflection and preparation!
Nov 26, 2013 6:16 PM
2
I was not given the materials I felt I needed. Despite 2 days of training in Reading Fundamentals, I was not adequately prepared for teaching the program.
Nov 25, 2013 4:57 PM
3
Guided reading books and lesson planning for guided reading is not part of the Reading Fundamentals program. More books are needed for the earliest reading levels.
Nov 23, 2013 7:07 PM
4
We received training in running a Reading Workshop model, but did not learn enough about how to deliver the new Rdg Fundamentals lessons within a balanced literacy frame work. The RF lessons provide the whole group modeling but take a long time to deliver which leaves teachers struggling with time for small group instruction. Some PD from the publishers or our Bal Lit coaches modeling how to deliver the RF lessons in the time frame suggested in the plans is necessary to build teacher capacity.                  We also need many more books for small group instruction and independent reading - independent reading book needs are especially critical at the primary level as kids are expected to have 10-12 books in their book boxes at one time.
Nov 22, 2013 11:13 AM
5
There were too many curriculum changes this year. We have been given training on these changes; however, when everything (Reading, WRiting, and Math) is being changed at the same time -it's hard to feel like you are doing a good job at teaching all of it. Additionally there has not been time to teacher to truly collaborate on curriculum -instead our collaboration meetings time have been pre-determined agenda that only involve looking at data not the curriculum.
Nov 22, 2013 6:41 AM
6
My resources continue to be purchased through the PPS department, it is an ongoing process.
Nov 21, 2013 1:08 PM
7
We don't have all the materials to implement our new reading program. Not enough books for each child to have 5-6 books in his/her book box. You also have provided materials such as word list words and no directive as to how to incorporate this into the curriculum.
Nov 19, 2013 9:07 AM
8
I feel like I have been trained to do many things, but I am rarely given time to really take what I have learned and apply it to classroom instruction (creating lessons, assessments, working effectively with a co-teacher). I do not always need to be monitored or given a task to do during the Monday hour. I am able to manage my time to best meet my students' needs.
Nov 19, 2013 7:59 AM
9
There was a lot rolled out this year. It's been a stressful year....
Nov 18, 2013 7:34 PM
10
The reading fundmentals training (I attended in June) did not prepare me at all for the school year. Fountas and Pinnell changes, report card changes were not communicated, early enough, and we received vocabulary words too late, and were given no guidance on how to effectively teach them. Yes, we did writing fundamentals last year, but we have knew units and I would have liked some training on those as well. I feel like we are teaching new reading and writing
curriculums this year. In addition, the Math training on e-suities was horrendous. It was not helpful since classes were not built and we couldn't access any of the information.
Nov 18, 2013 9:50 AM
11
Need Words Their Way, math workshop, and Writing Fundamentals training, and PD on the scope and sequence documents.
Nov 17, 2013 5:12 PM
12
I have been fed so much that I haven't had a chance to chew on anything. I don't know the common core. I don't know how Schoolwide fits with it. There has been no buy in. And, the buy in for Learning for All was rushed. All we seem to be doing are knee-jerk, quick reactions to change which has led to upheaval and dis-ease.
Nov 17, 2013 10:43 AM
13
The rollout was much too late-right at the start of school year when we are the busiest. There was NO time even to digest the information, much less study the materials before having to begin using it.
Nov 16, 2013 7:10 AM
14
This year has seemed very rushed, as though there was not much thought in the length of tine for delivery. I feel like I am jamming too much information into each day.
Nov 15, 2013 7:32 PM
15
The curriculum is changing so quickly, I do not feel adequately prepared to be the best teacher I can be. Many questions have been posed to administration, but few answers have been given to help teachers out!
Nov 11, 2013 6:37 PM
16
Does not apply
Nov 11, 2013 1:37 PM
17
It is what it is. This job requires a lot of thinking on your feet and using good judgment.
Nov 11, 2013 10:27 AM
18
We need more continual training for balanced literacy instruction and assessment under the new model.
Nov 9, 2013 6:37 PM
19
The language arts document was rolled out to the staff the week before school began. Shouldn't this have gotten into the hands of the teachers who it impacted earlier? The resource I need is TIME.
Nov 9, 2013 3:14 PM
20
We were given new curriculum to implement with little to no time to review it and plan for it.
Nov 8, 2013 7:00 PM
21
Need increased training opportunities for SPED staff in SPED law and compliance issues related to IDEA - it's been years since we have had any instruction in that area
Nov 8, 2013 3:09 PM
22
Disagree as my department's curriculum was significantly altered over the summer and the changes were not given to staff until the day before students arrived. Most teachers plan all summer - to be told to "hold off" on preparing for the school year was both disconcerting and stress-inducing.
Nov 8, 2013 11:45 AM
23
Non-fiction texts we were told would be ordered last June to support our curriculum were not ordered come August.
Nov 8, 2013 10:32 AM
24
Everyday Math training was poor.
Nov 8, 2013 6:08 AM
25
As a non- general classroom teacher I did not require any additional training from prior years.
Nov 7, 2013 1:43 PM
26
If students had access to technology it would help in teaching (i.e. one-to-one)
Nov 6, 2013 2:04 PM
27
Some changes were given to us without a direct plan. There was a sense of confusion regarding what our expectations were and how we were supposed to meet those.
Nov 6, 2013 9:54 AM
28
I do not feel the grades effected by opt-in were given adequate time, information, or resources in a timely mannert.
Nov 6, 2013 5:32 AM
29
It seems as if we are always being asked to change up our instruction, but often these requests are not accompanied by adequate training.
Nov 5, 2013 1:00 PM
30
Common Core implementation
Nov 4, 2013 5:24 PM
31
I am 60 years old and was assigned to work with 2 Kindergarten students with behavior issues and was not given any advanced notification or even asked how I felt about the position.
Nov 4, 2013 5:48 AM
32
I think there should be a NA. This question seems directed toward classroom/content area teachers.
Nov 3, 2013 6:14 PM
33
The training was very philosophical in nature and the learning was through teacher conversation personal reading and research on my own time.
Nov 3, 2013 10:23 AM
34
There were too many changes made at once without the proper amount of time to become familiar with it all. Many are feeling overwhelmed by it. Decisions are being made too late to implement correctly and decisions appear to be made without consulting the teachers who are actually teaching it every day.
Nov 3, 2013 4:57 AM
35
The registration process was very difficult, confusing and inefficient. The payment process was impossible to maneuver and/or explain to parents.
Oct 31, 2013 7:40 AM
36
We need time immediately after training on various websites to actually explore the websites. The one hour of F&P training was inadequate. I would have like to spend time with teacher in the district who piloted the reading to get ideas on how to organize the classroom and materials, and how to keep records. WI need more books even after going to Goodwill to add to my library.
Oct 30, 2013 7:47 AM
37
Although I feel I received training and feel prepared. I feel that I have been proactive in learning about the common core and have been involved in the process via committee work. I am not sure if the feeling of preparedness is something that is felt across the district.
Oct 30, 2013 6:54 AM

Page 4, Q8. From the options below, please select the primary sources you use for information about the District. (Select all that apply.) If there are additional communication channels you would like the District to consider using (video, Facebook, print newsletters, etc.), please indicate those suggestions...
1
committee meetings
Nov 26, 2013 6:55 AM
2
I wish trainings were videotaped and could be watched later.
Nov 25, 2013 5:00 PM
3
Add Facebook
Nov 21, 2013 9:10 PM
4
It would be nice to see the district Twitter feed embedded in the district website. I'm not on Twitter all the time and easily miss tweets.
Nov 20, 2013 6:50 PM
5
Video podcasts would be much better than audio only.
Nov 15, 2013 7:35 PM
6
DLT Meetings
Nov 11, 2013 7:37 PM
7
A similar newsletter to Colleague Connections, that focuses primarily on each school. For example, the staff at Walker would receive a newsletter about the events, concerns, meetings, etc. that has occurred there.
Nov 6, 2013 4:18 PM
8
Communications are acceptable however not timely .
Nov 3, 2013 10:31 AM
9
Better integration of social media with the district website.
Oct 31, 2013 4:31 AM
10
I wish the communication given was consistent. Most times the teachers receive different answers to the same question. The answer depends on which administrator you ask and the answer changes every minute. And the administrators don't always know that their counterparts are giving different responses.
Oct 30, 2013 6:54 PM
11
Facebook
Oct 30, 2013 11:03 AM

Page 4, Q11. If you chose "Rarely" or "Never" from the options above, please note the reason in the space below.
1
Too busy
Nov 22, 2013 10:18 AM
2
I read it when it is sent out. I rarely go back to it for information.
Nov 22, 2013 4:52 AM
3
After I have read it I feel i have the information I need. If there was an important date I write it down.
Nov 21, 2013 5:34 AM
4
Too many daily emails. Lack of time.
Nov 17, 2013 5:21 PM
5
Your focus seems to be on the same people, mostly central administration and teachers who've been published or received recognition outside of the district. I imagine there are many amazing things happening within the schools that are often overlooked in your stories.
Nov 17, 2013 5:31 AM
6
Time and I figure if I need to know something I'll be told by XXXXXXX or a representative from a district committee.
Nov 9, 2013 6:42 PM
7
Not much of interest and doesnt seem to include anything about HESS. Also, hard to open since the only time we have for computer is at school if we cant afford our own.
Nov 8, 2013 11:57 AM
8
There's no time to do extra reading! We lose 2 hours of planning time as it is with all the "collaboration" meetings.
Nov 7, 2013 1:02 PM
9
I don't read it because I feel as though the information does not always apply to me. I feel overwhelmed trying to attend to so many other things within the work day, that I don't make time to read through the CC for information that might apply to me.
Nov 7, 2013 6:43 AM
10
I have other, more important things upon which I should focus
Nov 6, 2013 4:58 PM
11
90% of what I see in the Newsletter has no reference to my job and I find it is information I can mostly do without
Nov 4, 2013 7:06 AM
12
Too wordy
Nov 4, 2013 5:48 AM
13
It's just one more thing to read. We receive 35+ emails a day on top of everything else we do.
Nov 3, 2013 5:03 AM
14
There are so many other things to do.
Oct 30, 2013 8:10 AM

Page 4, Q12. Please provide any feedback regarding the content of Colleague Connections, including content you find valuable or enjoyable, content you do not find valuable or enjoyable, or content you would suggest adding.
1
I love getting this every Friday! It's a very nice way to wrap up the week and share between schools and between administration and teachers!!! Please keep it up :-)
Nov 26, 2013 6:29 PM
2
District directives are sometimes found in the last pages - changes in teacher expectation for what. Reading workshop looks like .. Not sure this is the right forum for directives
Nov 26, 2013 5:09 PM
3
I believe this is a place for brief summaries of information. Longer informational essays don't usually get read in this format.
Nov 25, 2013 6:13 PM
4
Thank you XXXXXXXX I enjoy it
Nov 23, 2013 6:04 AM
5
I enjoy reading about all the good things that are going on at other schools. I don't feel the Colleague Connections is a forum for a 2 1/2 directive from the Dept. of Learning.
Nov 22, 2013 11:18 AM
6
I was surprised to find out that there was important curricular information included in this letter, that was not in other areas.
Nov 22, 2013 8:26 AM
7
attach boe meeting minutes
Nov 22, 2013 7:04 AM
8
I did not expect it to be a vehicle for giving directives about how to mark report cards(ie. marking NA for "Mastering assigned words"). I missed it, but a colleague caught it.
Nov 22, 2013 4:52 AM
9
Professional development opportunities
Nov 22, 2013 3:26 AM
10
I enjoy reading all the different things included in it.
Nov 21, 2013 2:18 PM
11
it is valuable to see what other schools are doing that are academically related. Boosterthons, halloween pictures, etc. are not as valuable as it doesn't help me learn about best practice in the district.
Nov 21, 2013 1:12 PM
12
I believe it has become more informative than in the past, and I look forward to reading. It is a resource for me that keeps me informed about the whole district.
Nov 21, 2013 4:27 AM
13
I would like to see an innovative teaching practice of the week from a teacher. It would also be great to see some great ideas from other districts - I think it is important to know where we stand for better or worse.
Nov 20, 2013 6:50 PM
14
I view this as a less formal, fun, communication from the district.
Nov 20, 2013 4:29 AM
15
Great!! Feel connected to staff across district!
Nov 19, 2013 9:47 AM
16
Time sensitive information (report card info) shouldn't be located only here. With changes to the first trimester report card appeared hidden.
Nov 18, 2013 7:38 PM
17
I always check it, but it rarely has anything of value written it it. You have an effective tool for communication to staff, and if you don't use it the right way, it will lose its value.
Nov 18, 2013 9:56 AM
18
Because of how precious my time is, I only want to be informed of news I have to
know to be a great teacher. The rest is just fluff. I need to have time to be a mother, wife, and daughter.
Nov 17, 2013 5:21 PM
19
It is good to see what is happening elsewhere. I shouldn't be finding out critical information FOR THE FIRST TIME in a Colleague Connections, however (i.e. NA on report card items).
Nov 17, 2013 10:46 AM
20
I like it as it is. The only change might be in the ELA part that addresses good things we are seeing in classrooms. It is too general and I assume these things are taking place because it is now expected to be taking place. When I read what teachers are doing above and beyond what is expected, that makes me pay attention and say, "Great idea, I should try that!"
Nov 17, 2013 5:49 AM
21
Please stop putting important DOL information in this publication. That type of information should come in a more formal way.
Nov 12, 2013 2:57 PM
22
Stick with the need to know stuff!
Nov 11, 2013 6:41 PM
23
I enjoy photos of staff members and special news information from the different schools.
Nov 11, 2013 6:18 PM
24
I like the fun parts of the Colleague Connections.
Nov 9, 2013 6:42 PM
25
Some of the important district directives are "buried" into the "fluff" (ie. Halloween cosutmes)....I suggest putting the HAVE TO KNOW info first and then the other fun stuff. Like to see all parts of it but I think some people miss the important stuff due to positioning.
Nov 8, 2013 3:17 PM
26
I enjoy every part of it.
Nov 8, 2013 10:58 AM
27
Sometimes it seems like there's too much fluff. I'd prefer the facts and the important stuff in a clear and easy to find manner.
Nov 8, 2013 10:36 AM
28
I enjoy the photos but can't see them very clearly. Could they be more like a photograph and less like a drawing?
Nov 8, 2013 10:04 AM
29
Please see answer to question 11
Nov 7, 2013 6:43 AM
30
Enjoy the teacher highlights as I can get to know my colleagues professionally.
Nov 7, 2013 5:59 AM
31
I enjoy reading the celebrations around the district and the highlights of what is happening at other schools. I also like reading about the staff - the little interviews- I've learned a lot about colleagues.
Nov 7, 2013 4:37 AM
32
The dates and notifications of upcoming events, meetings, schedules to be valuable. I would suggest adding more of the important information from Board meetings and if possible or upcoming changes or new initiatives that will be implemented. This will help the support staff who are not required to attend meetings, but would like to remain "in the loop" or District and school-wide information.
Nov 6, 2013 4:18 PM
33
I enjoy the pictures of various events.
Nov 6, 2013 2:18 PM

Page 4, Q12. Please provide any feedback regarding the content of Colleague Connections, including content you find valuable or enjoyable, content you do not find valuable or enjoyable, or content you would suggest adding.
34
Upcoming dates for various events
Nov 6, 2013 10:30 AM
35
It is a nice to have positive news on a weekly basis.
Nov 6, 2013 5:34 AM
36
Love school, student, and staff highlights!
Nov 5, 2013 5:33 PM
37
Very informative and offers a variety of information and resources
Nov 5, 2013 1:07 PM
38
I think that in general it is good that we try to "connect" as professional colleagues. I would like to see more of this in faculty meetings and building functions, because it seems as if morale in the building is low.
Nov 5, 2013 1:03 PM
39
I enjoy reading it.
Nov 5, 2013 12:54 PM
40
I would like the board summaries on Tuesday.
Nov 5, 2013 10:42 AM
41
I like the photos and positive stories out of buildings.
Nov 5, 2013 5:20 AM
42
Any information that needs to be relayed to me is done so by a colleague at work. I don't feel like I need to read the newsletter in order to get vital information I need to do my job.
Nov 4, 2013 7:06 AM
43
I think that it is informative. I like being able to see what other schools are doing to engage their students.
Oct 31, 2013 7:28 PM
44
We don't like hearing important information for the first time via the Colleague Connections. If it is important to know tell us in person!
Oct 30, 2013 6:54 PM
45
I think it is great exactly how it is. Not too long to read but information that is important to know.
Oct 30, 2013 11:03 AM
46
Forget the contests and awards. Awards for the most attendance at this race or that...Halloween costume awards..
Oct 30, 2013 10:18 AM
47
Information about district initiatives helpful.
Oct 30, 2013 7:50 AM
48
I thought of the colleague connections as just being optional reading material to learn more about what our colleagues are doing. I don't like that there is now curriculum items in it that I feel like I HAVE to read it each week or I might miss something. I feel like the focus has shifted. I learned about changes to a Words Their Way program first by reading the Colleague Connections which I think was wrong.
Oct 29, 2013 3:48 PM

Page 4, Q13. Please select the response below that best applies.
1
Although I feel that the podcasts are a terrific way to bring the Board Meetings to all of us, I feel that the BOE on the whole has been quite negative and disrespectful to our administration and superintendent, which I think sends a very poor message to our community especially when the BOE then talks about what's been done regarding SELAS. We are very fortunate to have these administrators with so much energy and so much to offer our students... they are the people with years of experience and degrees in education. I'm not aware of any BOE members with MAs and/or PHDs in education.
Nov 26, 2013 6:29 PM
2
Communication is often unclear we receive in formation I an email on Saturday morning regarding the teaching of sight words, and information in the colleague connection sometime, parent hand-outs one hour before covferences and then the info is pulled. Not professional material are not proof read example superintendent letter today Mis-spellings.
Nov 26, 2013 5:09 PM
3
I do not have a response to the BoE partnership with the staff and community, but couldn't leave it blank...
Nov 26, 2013 6:55 AM
4
I struggle with all of the last minute decisions that affect what I do in the classroom.
Nov 22, 2013 11:18 AM
5
I am commenting on # 14. All my years in this distrct, prior to this one, I would have mark very satisfied. However, this year has been incredibly stressful. So many new things,and expectations all at once.
Nov 22, 2013 4:52 AM
6
Different buildings offer varying levels of a 'positive and welcoming environment'. Some district level staff also give off an unwelcoming vibe (not only unwelcoming, but condescending in my opinion).
Nov 21, 2013 1:12 PM
7
There is a lot of communication from the District. However, the messages communicated are often unclear or conflicting messages are given. There also seems to be numerous times when information is communicated and then after the message is communicated, changes are made.
Nov 20, 2013 7:04 PM
8
I dislike the loss of planning time for required collaboration that we were doing anyways, but at other times during the day.
Nov 17, 2013 5:21 PM
9
I have not seen any Board Members visiting schools yet this year. Being a parent myself, I know my view of my child's school is filtered through my child's eyes. Actually being in a school and seeing it for myself gives me a different perspective. So in my opinion, with the board being as involved as it is in this district, it makes sense to me that they would want to see schools in action. I welcome a visit any time!
Nov 17, 2013 5:49 AM
10
Where are the Neutral and/or Not Applicable categories? I can't always provide a simple Agree/Disagree answer to these questions.
Nov 16, 2013 5:59 AM
11
While I feel that District 181 is welcoming to parents/students, I feel more and more disrespected as a teacher. I used to enjoy working in this community more than I do now.
Nov 11, 2013 6:41 PM
12
Often hard to review emails during school day -- often have to do it on my own time. No dedicated computer access.
Nov 11, 2013 10:30 AM
35 of 46
Page 4, Q13. Please select the response below that best applies.
13
Some questions are unanswered at times by central administration. I have no idea if the Board is improving or not in communication.
Nov 9, 2013 6:42 PM
14
The Department of Learning does NOT want to hear any opinions about curriculum or how it is being delivered unless it aligns with theirs. I think parents and staff are frustrated with the lack of transparency regarding issues related to the district.
Nov 9, 2013 3:18 PM
15
I feel some of the vocal staff / community members that speak in opposition to D181 plan constantly have become overbearing to D181 administrators and they are frustrated. Because of the frustration, any 1 time question from staff is seen as going "against" D181 admin and the Learning for All Plan.                  There is an "us" against "them" mentality that I hopecan be rectified.
Nov 8, 2013 3:17 PM
16
I often have difficulty finding things on the website.
Nov 8, 2013 12:28 PM
17
Communication with the community and about district decisions in general seems to be regular and abundant. However, the timeliness with which staff receives directives and changes to directives needs work. Very often we receive information the day before something important changes or must be done.
Nov 8, 2013 11:47 AM
18
I feel beat down by the board and that they definitely do not view teachers as partners. I was disappointed that no board member was available to even welcome us on the first Institute Day at the beginning of the year. That was very telling.                  I feel the administrative leadership respects us and is attempting to support us as much as they can this year.
Nov 8, 2013 10:58 AM
19
In terms of communication, I think it depends on the issue. As it relates to standard communication..curriculum, school safety, etc. the principals and district are efficient. As it relates to more controversial topics, I do not feel the district or board are always transparent. I hear more from my colleagues than the truth from those who are the decision-makers.
Nov 8, 2013 10:36 AM
20
This school year began on a serious effort to include ALL the staff. I feel the district does appreciate what we do.
Nov 7, 2013 11:48 AM
21
Sometimes there are directives that come from district administration to certified staff that we really need to be more timely. I feel that is an area we can work on improving.
Nov 7, 2013 4:37 AM
22
Some of the statements above I had no opinion because I do not know and therefore checked agree.
Nov 6, 2013 2:09 PM
23
I think communication has improved, however there is still work to be done. Communication from administration to parents is crucial and I don't believe that communication is consistent or provided on a regular basis, which it needs to be. This district has changed so drastically in terms of programs and curriculum, and there needs to be more communication about guidelines, etc. to staff and parents from administration.
Nov 6, 2013 10:30 AM
24
There is too many last minute communications from district office.
Nov 5, 2013 12:18 PM
25
The disagreement comes from the control being placed on teachers to discuss
Nov 3, 2013 10:31 AM
36 of 46
Page 4, Q13. Please select the response below that best applies.
demands expectations opinions and deep concerns with the direction the district is heading.
26
We are a strong district but I feel we are starting to get left behind by many other districts, especially in the technology component.                  We will continue to be strong because we have bright students and quality educators but I feel like we are falling behind because of certain decisions being made by the board and central admin regarding curriculum and technology.
Nov 3, 2013 5:03 AM
27
The timeliness of the communication is more important than "too much" communication. It would be nice for the staff to know information before parents/community so that we are prepared to respond, i.e. PTO Presidents meetings. They seem to know a lot more than we do.
Oct 31, 2013 7:50 AM
28
This year as a classroom teacher, I do not feel that I am a partner. I feel I am being told what to do like a teacher on remediation. The decision making and communication is very top down. Very stressful and it just keeps coming.
Oct 30, 2013 10:18 AM
29
I feel communication this year is NOT good. It seems like we get a different answer from day to day or person to person. It also seems like sometimes we are late to receive information that maybe other schools might have already received.
Oct 29, 2013 3:48 PM

Page 5, Q15. Please select the response below that best applies.
1
I don't feel I need more information about the LAP, CCSS or PARCC, because I feel we've been given sufficient information up till now, but I didn't see an appropriate response.
Nov 26, 2013 6:32 PM
2
Learning for all is misguided. Teachers come to school for all children to learn that is why we teach ! The message implies we have not been successful and everything needed to change when in fact small changes neede attention
Nov 26, 2013 5:15 PM
3
I find it ironic that with this plan we are teaching all differently so they can all be the same
Nov 23, 2013 6:06 AM
4
My content area has not released its Common Core Standards yet and is not assessed in the PARCC assessment as far as I know.
Nov 22, 2013 12:46 PM
5
The district has had a formal educational series for parents on the Common Core, but teachers have never been offered that same training. We should at least know as much as the parents.
Nov 22, 2013 11:25 AM
6
I don't think the "Learning for All" plan is not best for ALL students. I'm seeing students falling more and more behind because the RTI process is broken and special ed students are NOT getting what they need will all the push in
Nov 18, 2013 9:58 AM
7
As a non-math, non-LA teacher, I'm not entirely sure how I fit into the puzzle... and that's been a little discouraging.
Nov 15, 2013 4:16 PM
8
While I understand the vision of the learning for all plan, I feel I have asked and asked for answers in regards to how to implement without spending every waking minute of my life working and my questions fall on deaf ears. Many of my colleagues feel the same way. We are being forced to implement a plan that we are not totally on board with and I think this is a recipe for disaster, but noone at admin seems to care.
Nov 11, 2013 6:44 PM
9
I have done a great deal of investigating and learning about the Common Core so I do not feel that I need as much as some other people might.
Nov 8, 2013 10:59 AM
10
As a specialist, the common core standards and state assessment doesn't necessarily apply to me.
Nov 8, 2013 10:06 AM
11
I feel that the Common Core standards should align more with the Learning for All Plan. It feels like two separate initiatives at this time.
Nov 5, 2013 5:21 AM
12
While I understand the learning for all plan, I disagree with it.
Nov 4, 2013 5:50 AM
13
Again, there should be an NA option for certified staff that are not directly involved with ISAT/PARCC.
Nov 3, 2013 6:19 PM
14
I understanding the Learning for all plan and feel very concerned and disappointed that after an outside evaluation the district is adopting a plan that lacks data and experience. The gifted program needed adjustment not an overhaul of all of our programs. Common Core is an easy change and provides important growth as educators The learning for all adds an unnecessary layer of stress . We come to school to teach all children to learn...Learning for all title sounds like that was not our focus. Sadly teachers feel defeated before
beginning. How will students feel ? Teachers need to be praised and highly valued each and everyday
Nov 3, 2013 10:40 AM
15
This plan was flawed from the beginning.
Oct 31, 2013 11:06 AM
16
I understand the Learning for All Plan, but do not necessarily agree with it. It does not appear to meet the needs of all children and the expectations of it are unreasonable.
Oct 31, 2013 8:00 AM
17
Common Core and Learning for All implementation are too much at one time. Teachers are overworked, and under supported. I don't think Learning for All is well thought out or executed. I disagree with fundamental rationale that all students should be accelerated. That's not differentiation.
Oct 30, 2013 9:51 AM

Page 6, Q16. As the District looks to develop a five- to seven-year strategic plan, in the area of Students and Learning, please indicate how important you believe each item is by selecting the appropriate response below. You must select a response for each item. (Respondents are encouraged to select no more ...
1
1-to-1 technology so students' education becomes more broad, more creative, more at their disposal whenever inquiry crosses their mind.
Nov 26, 2013 7:35 PM
2
district helps students prepare for disappointments and challenges in the real world.
Nov 26, 2013 7:03 AM
3
Students need life skills, such as understanding money concepts and executive function skills, like planning, organization and time management.
Nov 25, 2013 5:10 PM
4
Because I'd the increased focus on rigor and CC it is created an imbalance in the emotional well being of children. I'm all for raising the bar, increasing literacy instruction, but what this district is doing to our kids in math at the elementary level is unnecessary. Just look at our data,we've proven we are strong In This area
Nov 23, 2013 6:16 AM
5
It's critical to provide not only ample staff development but QUALITY staff development
Nov 22, 2013 11:32 AM
6
Importance of handwriting as a foundational skill in K and First Grade.
Nov 20, 2013 7:15 AM
7
A recent news report stated the increased bully prevention programs are having the opposite effect on students. There is more bullying now than ever.
Nov 17, 2013 5:30 PM
8
Not only should school focus on positive behavior, I would like to see a partnership form with the community - same message from HOME and school
Nov 17, 2013 5:54 AM
9
Noe of this will happen until the Board makes a commitment to increase technology!
Nov 15, 2013 4:55 PM
10
I think we need to focus on best serving our students, rather than being #1 in the state/nation on a standardized test.
Nov 11, 2013 6:52 PM
11
Hello! Our students are pretty globally aware. Look around the classrooms!
Nov 11, 2013 10:36 AM
12
Students study dance and drama by trained dance and drama teachers
Nov 8, 2013 10:14 AM
13
Less homework and more focus on developing family and peer relations as well as time for oneself to explore other areas of interest. This middle school 6th and 7th grade homework is very overwhelming for our students.
Nov 7, 2013 6:53 AM
14
Science curriculum is already very strong at MS level; any strengthening needs to be al Elem. level
Nov 6, 2013 5:03 PM
15
District provides 30 minute daily PE classes.
Nov 3, 2013 6:24 PM
16
In order to retain the best possible staff, the Board and Community must treat the teachers respectfully, especially during negotiations. We must be seen as an equal team. Negotiations have been hurtful.
Nov 3, 2013 5:52 AM

Page 6, Q17. As the District looks to develop a five- to seven-year strategic plan, in the area of Finance and Facilities, please indicate how important you believe each item is by selecting the appropriate response below. You must select a response for each item. (Respondents are encouraged to select no more...
1
If the district goes 1-to-1, "school learning spaces will be more flexible & mobile" and "school learning spaces would be fully integrated with technology!" Also, balancing class sizes could go either way... class sizes should be smaller across the district.
Nov 26, 2013 7:35 PM
2
Adequate supervision of students during lunch recess is needed.
Nov 25, 2013 5:10 PM
3
For equitabilty It is important for the district to look at NUMBER of STUDENTS when allocating materials and personal. Building with large number of students are getting not making as much progress as smaller building with half the students but they are both given the same number of materials and staffings. There is direct correlation to this imbalance for students performances.
Nov 22, 2013 7:20 AM
4
If you're going to use technology, district needs to integrate and plan for it. It need to WORK!
Nov 11, 2013 10:36 AM
5
You cannot even consider removing portables at HMS until the space issue is resolved.
Nov 8, 2013 11:51 AM
6
The Hinsdale Middle School building is in serious need of repair. Additionally, this building does not provide the resources and space necessary for true "Learning for All." Additionally, this work environment does not feel safe nor does it lend itself to flexibility and supporting students.
Nov 7, 2013 6:53 AM
7
HMS needs more classrooms, not eliminating portable classrooms. Multiple traveling teachers every year is not best practice.
Nov 6, 2013 10:41 AM
8
Portables can not be removed as HMS needs the classroom space.
Nov 6, 2013 8:18 AM
9
HMS does not have enough room. How can we eliminate four more? Also, until class composition is equitable, merit pay should not come into play.
Nov 6, 2013 5:44 AM
10
More classroom space is needed at HMS - definitely not less!!!!!!!!!
Nov 5, 2013 5:37 PM
11
We need more classrooms to fit all of our students; we need phones and workspaces for all of our teachers. We need a building that is "water damage" free.
Nov 5, 2013 1:44 PM
12
more classrooms are needed
Nov 5, 2013 1:01 PM
13
HMS needs more classrooms, not less. We are incredibly overcrowded with teachers sharing spaces leaving no place for small group instruction.
Nov 5, 2013 12:22 PM
14
HMS needs MORE classrooms.
Nov 5, 2013 10:47 AM
15
Differentiation is essential in learning. As classes increase in size, it's increasingly more difficult to give each child what he/she needs.
Nov 3, 2013 5:52 AM

Page 6, Q18. As the District looks to develop a five- to seven-year strategic plan, in the area of Community Involvement, please indicate how important you believe each item is by selecting the appropriate response below. You must select a response for each item. (Respondents are encouraged to select no more ...
1
I think that community involvement should be encouraged, however they should not drive what the administration does.... again... our current administrators are the ones with the educational degrees.
Nov 26, 2013 7:35 PM
2
The problem teachers are voicing is the increase of the community aka parents in OUR profession! We need an administration that will support our rights when parents are emotionally and verbally abusive to our staff!
Nov 23, 2013 6:16 AM
3
Aren't the students a little young to be shadowing in area businesses?
Nov 11, 2013 10:36 AM
4
I would love to see board members/community members substitute teach in our classrooms so they a real feel for what it's like in a classroom right now.
Nov 3, 2013 5:08 AM

Page 7, Q20. How do you help to inform families about SEL (social and emotional learning) in school and/or in the District? (Select all that apply.)
1
Families are informed about SEL goals on Curriculum Night and surrounding SELAS Days.
Nov 11, 2013 6:55 PM
2
One that is missing: I incorporate SEL principles into my academic/classroom instruction.
Nov 8, 2013 11:52 AM
3
i am on the district committee
Oct 29, 2013 3:54 PM
Page 7, Q22. How do you get information about SEL in the District? (Select all that apply.)
1
I think our teachers do a great job using teachable moments to reinforce good citizenship and leadership. LionsQuest is a canned program that has its limitations especially if mandated for the sake of sending home worksheets.
Nov 26, 2013 7:45 PM
2
school social worker
Nov 20, 2013 7:16 AM
3
I choose to live a life that balances and includes social/emotional well-being. Life lessons are sometimes the best!
Nov 19, 2013 8:08 AM
4
Classroom instruction
Nov 15, 2013 4:24 AM
45 of 46
Page 7, Q23. What information would you like to learn about SELAS in District 181, and how would you like to receive that information (via what channel)?
1
I do not need more information about SELAS, because our committee members and principal do a good job sharing what is going on :-)
Nov 26, 2013 7:45 PM
2
Colleague Connections
Nov 23, 2013 7:17 PM
3
I would like to know how we form relationships with the community - specifically our district families. I think the program is strongest when students hear the same thing from school and home.
Nov 17, 2013 6:03 AM
4
How parents can participate with teaching their children about SELAS at home and at school
Nov 16, 2013 10:18 AM
5
more staff trainings.
Nov 16, 2013 8:01 AM
6
District e-mail
Nov 15, 2013 4:24 AM
7
A useable overview of all SELAS standards K-5, preferably on one page. Organized by month or trimester. Email would be ideal to receive this info.
Nov 8, 2013 10:19 AM
8
I would like to receive the information from case managers, and be given ideas how to incorporate into the different classrooms where I help out.
Nov 8, 2013 9:04 AM
9
Staff meetings.
Nov 7, 2013 12:05 PM
10
I'd like to see the district move away from the Lion's Quest program in the middle schools and find more age-appropriate ways to implement SELAS into the curriculum, school events, daily announcements, advertisement in the halls, teacher modeling, etc.
Nov 7, 2013 6:56 AM
11
During staff development, in the staff newsletter, or via team leaders
Nov 6, 2013 2:27 PM
12
The year overview, via email or hard copy.
Nov 5, 2013 1:46 PM

RESIDENT COMMENTS:

Page 3, Q2. From the options below, please select the primary sources you use for information about District 181. (Select all that apply.) If there are additional communication channels you would like the District to consider using (video, Facebook, print newsletters, etc.), please indicate those suggestions...
1
Please provide a link to School activities and Board Meeting results in the Doings and in the regular Clarendon Hills Village e-Newsletter
Nov 23, 2013 7:11 PM
2
Doings
Nov 17, 2013 1:38 PM
3
Newspapers
Nov 8, 2013 4:45 AM

Page 3, Q3. Please select the response below that best applies.
1
The Board of Education is not respectful to our administrators.
Nov 26, 2013 7:47 PM
2
Although this survey is a positive indicator of the EFFORT to improve community feedback/communication, please also provide a means of more regular communication for those of us that no longer have children enrolled in 181 (eg. they all get older sometime). We are STILL INTERESTED in knowing what is going on.
Nov 23, 2013 7:11 PM
3
There needs to be more communication highlighting what the Board is doing, what issues they are addressing and what decisions they are making.
Nov 16, 2013 1:43 PM
4
Continued turnover of Principals in D181 and Superintendents indicates something is problematic.Third grade ISAT scores this past year indicate that by this benchmark year the lack of rigor in D181 is apparent.Curriculum and staff changes should be evaluated.How are teachers evaluated?There is a lack of consistent leadership due to Principal turnover. Ask yourselves why are your Principals leaving D181?
Nov 10, 2013 10:43 AM
5
I can't say that D181 is transparent or works with the community, especially after XXXXXXX and XXXXXX comments about FOIA's. Very disappointing.
Nov 8, 2013 1:21 PM
6
These questions need an N/A option or you will get misleading information. I selected agree when I wasn't sure or didn't have an opinion
Nov 8, 2013 4:45 AM
7
It is a positive and welcoming environment for the students. Community members, however, and their incendiary rhetoric make it very challenging to work in the district.
Nov 6, 2013 6:31 PM
8
Questions re improved communication do not include a time period, but I am assuming they refer to increased communications via board docs and podcast, as well as more recent additional communication vehicles, such as e-News.
Nov 6, 2013 12:19 PM
9
too much focus on appeasing teacher salary and benefits as well as Superintendents agenda. Teachers are paid as much as 50% over the market rates and admin as well. Spending more money does not equal improvements. Market salaries for all incoming and reduce the salary increases, especially for near retirement people
Nov 1, 2013 1:21 PM

Page 4, Q5. Please select the response below that best applies.
1
never heard of Learning for All Plan
Nov 17, 2013 1:51 PM
2
Seems to be another way to add overhead
Nov 14, 2013 1:29 PM
3
Does not apply to me.
Nov 14, 2013 12:22 PM
4
I think that pushing ALL kids a year ahead in math is ridiculous! Why rush all kids. If someone wants to be challenged, let them move ahead. I believe it is irresponsible of D181 to make all kids move ahead in math!!
Nov 12, 2013 2:10 PM
5
Teachers are not prepared to implement the Common Core as fast as ISBE demands.PARCC is just another of the many many assessments ISBE now thinks is the only way to measure intellligence.Whatever happened to Bloom's Taxonomy? Education is becoming robotic.Can D181 opt out?
Nov 10, 2013 10:49 AM
6
After much study of the Learning for All Plan, I am definitely not convinced that it fits D181's needs. Maybe in districts and communities like Oak Park or West Chicago, there would be a need for a social justice program. The D181 Administrators, most specifically XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXX, are pushing this program for their own interests and NOT the interests of what is best for the students of D181. The BOE definitely needs to review this Learning for All approach and really see if it fits and is needed in D181. Don't be surprised if this educational approach goes ahead and then when things fall apart for D181 that XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXX are long gone and off to their next positions!!!
Nov 8, 2013 1:28 PM
7
I think that the implementation and the basis for the Learning for All plan has been a failure at the Elementary Schools. I have received a lot of negative feedback from parents who still have kids in the district. Teaching students in heterogeneous class rooms is going to take far more resources than we can afford as a district.
Nov 5, 2013 2:44 PM
8
Information in media reads biased towards administration
Nov 3, 2013 4:11 PM

Page 5, Q6. As the District looks to develop a five- to seven-year strategic plan, in the area of Students and Learning, please indicate how important you believe each item is by selecting the appropriate response below. (Respondents are encouraged to select no more than six items as "mandatory" or "very imp...
1
Let the teachers teach! They are professional -- put an end to professional development as we know it.
Nov 25, 2013 4:45 PM
2
I really am impressed by the list of options. Here's the problem; easy to talk about doing all of this but another to actually accomplish it
Nov 20, 2013 4:27 AM
3
Perhaps some of the principals/teachers should focus on a no bullying policy amongst staff.
Nov 12, 2013 11:58 PM
4
Should be focused on Reading, Writing, Arithmetic. Why would a middle schooler need technical/vocational skills?
Nov 12, 2013 2:10 PM
5
D181 is a K-8 district and, therefore, really wouldn't get involved with vocational career training. However, previously D181 at the middle school level did have programs on potential careers. Don't know where that went. D181 doesn't need all day kindergarten. Our students come to kindergarten very prepared. D181 is not and should not be in the business of day care!
Nov 8, 2013 1:42 PM
6
Full day kindergarten is VERY VERY important!!!!!
Nov 7, 2013 6:06 PM
7
Demanding a #1 ranking is aspirational and egotistical at worst. Get the right curriculum and hire the right staff and the rest will follow. Madison and HMS achieved blue ribbon status with out setting out to be #1.
Nov 7, 2013 2:50 PM
8
include practical finance skills development
Nov 7, 2013 1:08 PM
9
How does the older child in a class handle the bullying if you ignore age and go by ability only? When/how do you work to build that child to age appropriate abilities if you've lowered that child a grade (or more)? How will the environment affect that child? -to do better?
Nov 3, 2013 9:06 AM
10
It's important to not level the field in differentiation. There are different abilities and all need appropriate resources. Don't dumb down the top which is where I see the learning for all going.
Nov 1, 2013 2:42 PM
11
Full day kindergarten really is a must in a community and district of this caliber.
Oct 31, 2013 11:33 AM

Page 5, Q7. As the District looks to develop a five- to seven-year strategic plan, in the area of Finance and Facilities, please indicate how important you believe each item is by selecting the appropriate response below. (Respondents are encouraged to select no more than six items as "mandatory" or "very im...
1
Tear down the Hinsdale Middle School and build a new one. It is a disgrace and embarrassment to District 181. After all that has been done to try and improve it, it doesn't work. Build a Hinsdale Middle School like CHMS.
Nov 25, 2013 4:45 PM
2
Fund balances don't have to be as high as 50% of expenditures. It is totally unrealistic to think that property taxes are going to be lowered. I don' t think people move to D181 expecting that. Taxpayers just expect value for their high taxes! Also, to expect D181 to never have financial debt is ridiculous.
Nov 8, 2013 1:42 PM
3
Merit based teacher pay is very important
Nov 8, 2013 4:51 AM
4
Bring in outside educators / experts for occasional instruction
Nov 7, 2013 1:08 PM
5
overall maintain the goal of quality education.
Nov 3, 2013 4:32 PM
6
Get rid of tenure and the weak teachers. Merit pay for the best, replace the worst. Bring taxes down, the community has suffered the last few years and this has not been reflected in contracts and tax levies
Nov 1, 2013 2:42 PM
7
what is a small class size? what does no financial debt mean, you always have outstanding bonds?
Oct 30, 2013 12:37 PM

Page 5, Q8. As the District looks to develop a five- to seven-year strategic plan, in the area of Community Involvement, please indicate how important you believe each item is by selecting the appropriate response below. (Respondents are encouraged to select no more than three items as "mandatory" or "very i...
1
Why do you want the schools to support community events? Let the teachers teach and concentrate on the students. All the extra stuff takes valuable time away from the teachers.
Nov 25, 2013 4:45 PM
2
There is a cost to getting the community involved as noted above. Is the district prepared to pay for administering these activities? As a former d181 parent, I hated to see advertising of any kind in the school. Kids are there to learn, not be used to promote local businesses.
Nov 7, 2013 2:50 PM
3
Reach out to higher ed community for incubation of concepts taking shape in education improvement
Nov 7, 2013 1:08 PM
4
Community participation to be seen positive
Nov 3, 2013 4:32 PM

Page 6, Q11. How have you learned about SEL (social and emotional learning) in the District? (Select all that apply.)
1
teacher
Nov 12, 2013 11:59 PM
2
Had children in the schools
Nov 12, 2013 10:03 AM
3
from when my children were in 181
Nov 9, 2013 3:03 PM
4
I was a member of the committee that initiated and planned the SELAS program in D181.
Nov 8, 2013 1:45 PM
5
My children began the program
Nov 2, 2013 8:03 AM
6
Had a student in district
Nov 1, 2013 2:46 PM
7
staff member
Oct 31, 2013 4:53 PM

Page 6, Q12. What information about SEL/SELAS do you want to know? (Select all that apply.)
1
SELAS great in theory but does not work. there are still a bunch of bullies at CHMS
Nov 20, 2013 4:30 AM
2
how does the district measure the success of SELAS
Nov 9, 2013 3:03 PM
3
I would like to know about the CURRENT SELAS program in D181
Nov 8, 2013 1:45 PM
4
Too much emphasis in place of teaching the basics
Nov 1, 2013 2:46 PM

Page 6, Q13. Please note any ideas / questions related to social emotional learning and SELAS in District 181.
1
Does this take away time from academic endeavors?
Nov 25, 2013 5:35 PM
2
You need to have more parent education on bullying as parents are a lot of the problem. Too many entitled children
Nov 20, 2013 4:30 AM
3
Some things should be taught at home. Do the parents have no responsibility for their childs well beeing?
Nov 17, 2013 1:58 PM
4
I support SELAS and am happy the district uses it for student growth. However how can it be expected to work for students when many of the teachers responsible for its delivery, especially at HMS, constantly bully other teachers and are allowed to form exclusive groups, especially at the hand of the principal who rarely visits classrooms or is seen in the halls/rooms as a matter of just being a part of the school? Bullying is ignored and allowed to grow at the teacher grass root level. Building administrators have been quoted as saying "oh well, she/he retires in 4 years/3years/2years...just hang in there. That is not a model for SELAS or for supporting teachers. Teachers play games like burping in others faces to see how many burps it takes to get a teacher to leave a daily lunch situation (this has been known to have gone on for months), have been known to set up skyping situations to make fun of and encourage fights amongst teachers at meetings while others watch and laugh at what happens in other remote building locations. HCHTA rules are allowed to be broken by teachers who file complaints against others and then gossip about what they have done and how they have filed complaints when the HCHTA rules clearly state all complaints are confidential. Teachers and administrators must be held accountable to SELAS objectives when working with each other...and principals/admin need to be brave enough to confront bullying amongst teachers.
Nov 12, 2013 11:59 PM
5
I support SELAS and am happy the district uses it for student growth. However how can it be expected to work for students when many of the teachers responsible for its delivery, especially at HMS, constantly bully other teachers and are allowed to form exclusive groups, especially at the hand of the principal who rarely visits classrooms or is seen in the halls/rooms as a matter of just being a part of the school? Bullying is ignored and allowed to grow at the teacher grass root level. Building administrators have been quoted as saying "oh well, she/he retires in 4 years/3years/2years...just hang in there. That is not a model for SELAS or for supporting teachers. Teachers play games like burping in others faces to see how many burps it takes to get a teacher to leave a daily lunch situation (this has been known to have gone on for months), have been known to set up skyping situations to make fun of and encourage fights amongst teachers at meetings while others watch and laugh at what happens in other remote building locations. HCHTA rules are allowed to be broken by teachers who file complaints against others and then gossip about what they have done and how they have filed complaints when the HCHTA rules clearly state all complaints are confidential. Teachers and administrators must be held accountable to SELAS objectives when working with each other...and principals/admin need to be brave enough to confront bullying amongst teachers.
Nov 12, 2013 11:53 PM
6
I never found the program to be useful or helpful. It taught my kids to be fearful of taunting and bullying and see it in all things. It was not treated seriously, and simply became another compliance exercise for them.
Nov 12, 2013 10:03 AM
7
I feel it needs to be improved. More emphasis on this.
Nov 11, 2013 10:52 AM
8
Who sets the standard?
Nov 9, 2013 10:46 AM
9
My kids were in D181 from 2000 - 2011. This is the first time I have heard about SELAS.
Nov 7, 2013 2:51 PM
10
To be seen as important developmental dimension
Nov 3, 2013 4:39 PM
11
Too much emphasis. Good program to an extent, but sometimes overwhelms the curriculum when there are issues in actual core curricula that needs addressing.
Nov 1, 2013 2:46 PM
12
Cut this program and focus back on the basics. These issues are intuitive and common sense.
Nov 1, 2013 1:28 PM

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I hope the board takes these comments under consideration when they talk about Dr. Schuster's mid-year evaluation on Monday night. Even though the majority of the board and administration resisted having satisfaction questions, it looks like the community was smart enough to work around that. I think they spoke load and clear!! If things do not change soon I predict not only will test scores continue to decline, but we will have mass amounts of teacher talent that will leave the district. I fear teacher negotiations are going to be brutal because they do not appear to be a happy bunch - and I do not blame them.

Instead of raising the tax levy, let's get rid of the pork. Eliminate the majority of the central office administrators. Stop going to fluff conferences out of state. Stop producing copious amounts of propaganda with skewed data. Stop replacing perfectly good text books. Stop paying for substitutes and stop waisting valuable teaching time with worthless teacher meetings. Get back to basics!!!! Learning for all has cost of the district significantly more than the savings obtained from eliminating ACE. The community wants small class sizes, more technology, better facilities, gifted programming, foreign language and full day kindergarten - all things that directly benefit the students.

I was also very proud that the community knows that learning for all and common core are two different things. We are smarter than the board and administration gives us credit for!!

Also Bravo to the blog creators - you were very popular in the survey results. I wonder what the administration thinks about that!!