Looks like the "new clothes parade" is now going
national. Check out the following
link:
http://conference.tash.org/sessions/leading-proactive-high-achieving-schools-for-all-students/
This is for a national TASH conference that Kurt Schneider,
Assistant Superintendent of Learning (Pupil Services) is going to be presenting
at in Chicago on December 12.
(According to its website, TASH is an organization that promotes equity,
opportunity and Inclusion for people with Disabilities.)
The TASH conference website describes Schneider's session
as:
“LEADING PROACTIVE HIGH ACHIEVING SCHOOLS FOR ALL STUDENTS
Research and implementation efforts necessary to create systemically
united high performing schools for ALL students of all abilities at all
organizational levels in a school district. Grounded in the non-negotiable
principles of inclusive schooling from Capper & Frattura (2009),
participants will learn how to move a school district systematically forward
and share the improved student achievement results that occur as a result.”
This is the same 4-day conference (December 11 – 14) that
Dr. Schuster explained at the 9/9/13 Board Meeting that Schneider and other
administrators, teachers and parents are going to attend.
As Concerned Parents, we are fine with the head of the
special education department (Schneider) attending special education conferences,
and perhaps even presenting at them.
However, our problem with this particular conference is that his
presentation seems to be about the Learning for All Plan that is being rolled
out in D181 for ALL students, and we wouldn’t be surprised if D181 will serve
as the “data” source for any research that is presented at this conference by
Schneider. The description says it
all:
The plan or “efforts” that will be discussed purport to
impact ALL students, of ALL abilities and at ALL levels – not just those with
disabilities. The efforts are
“grounded” in NON-NEGOTIABLE principles of INCLUSION (the inverted, heterogeneous
model that is now being rammed down the throats of all students and teachers in
D181). And, these principles are
those developed by Capper and Frattura – his former colleagues at University of
Wisconsin, and fellow presenters at the Social Justice symposiums he has taught
at the last two summers. (Same conference
that 7 D181 administrators attended for a full week this summer.)
The description assumes that these “efforts” will result in
“improved student achievement.”
BUT WHERE ARE THE CLOTHES???? Where is the data that shows that this model has worked in
the past in high achieving districts like D181? Where is the data that shows that this model is working NOW
in D181 for ANY of our students – from those with disabilities to the highest
cognitive thinkers? We have yet to
see this “improved achievement” data and it is time the administration published
it for everyone to “see.” We haven’t heard Schneider’s mantra of “raise the
floor to raise the ceiling” in quite some time. Why not? Where
is the data on this? Is it
actually happening in D181?
Before we continue the “new clothes” parade, it needs to be
halted for some actual data collection and reporting.
Why is any D181 administrator jumping the gun and racing
ahead to proclaim success when so far, there is none to be shown? Why are the D181 School Board and
Superintendent so intent on thrusting D181 into the national spotlight? Why send another round of
administrators and this time working teachers (who will have to miss 3 days of
instruction) to this conference? And
it they do go, why don’t’ they only send the lead Special Education
administrator in the district and have him share what was learned with all
staff within the district? Why didn’t they do this after the summer “institute?”
Why not focus on the local needs of our children, and ensure
that something is actually working successfully? Keep the teachers in the
classroom for now. Keep the
administrators working in their offices for now. Is that too much to ask?
3 comments:
Here is the truth: While many parents have placed their full trust in the BOE and the administrator to do right by their children, Drs Schuster and Schneider have been focused on "inverting" the entire district on its head with no accountability or solid evidence to back up their claims of "celebration." Isn't is interesting that Kurt Schneider has time to devote to his public speaking jaunts while giving interviews to the local press instead of fixing the mess he has created.
So, our district is again sending administrators and teachers to a workshop to hear their own administrator present unfounded ideas. Who is paying for this? Is there a reason these unfounded ideas cannot be presented at a teacher meeting without making our students spend three days without their teachers? Why?
Perhaps understanding this system can help undo several things everyone regrets. Interestingly, nobody asks people abetting district dismantling effective dedicated classrooms "equalize levels logically."
Anon.
Post a Comment